Literature DB >> 8638780

Transesophageal echocardiography in myocardial revascularization: I. Accuracy of intraoperative real-time interpretation.

B D Bergquist1, J M Leung, W H Bellows.   

Abstract

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is increasingly used intraoperatively as a monitor of ventricular function and volume. Despite its increasing use, whether data from TEE monitoring can be interpreted accurately on-line in real-time is unknown. We studied the performance of five community-based, full-time cardiac anesthesiologists during 75 surgical procedures in which biplane TEE monitoring was used. Every 10 min intraoperatively, each anesthesiologist evaluated the video cine loop display of echocardiographic images to provide a real-time visual estimate of left ventricular ejection fraction area (EFA) and left ventricular filling at the level of the short axis and to assess regional wall-motion of the short axis and transgastric longitudinal views using a predefined scoring system. The same video images were analyzed quantitatively off-line by two blinded investigators. Intraoperative real-time estimates of EFA correlated moderately with off-line quantification (r = 0.8, P = 0.0001). Of the 662 cine loops analyzed by both off-line and real-time techniques, 386 (55%) were within +/-5% of each other, 495 (75%) were within +/-10% of each other, 561 (85%) were within +/-15% of each other, and 617 (93%) were within +/-20% of each other. The overall sensitivity and specificity of real-time echocardiographic ischemia detection were both 76%. However, there was individual variation among the five anesthesiologists. Recognition of normal and severe regional wall-motion abnormality, such as akinesis, had more concordance between real-time and off-line analysis, 93% and 79%, respectively, than recognition of mild regional wall-motion abnormalities. Anesthesiologists can estimate EFA in real-time to within +/-10% of off-line values in 75% of all cases. Real-time identification of normal regional function is more accurate than identification of abnormal function, i.e., there is variability in quantifying the severity of regional dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8638780     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199606000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  6 in total

1.  Transesophageal Echocardiography, Acute Kidney Injury, and Length of Hospitalization Among Adults Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.

Authors:  Emily J MacKay; Rachel M Werner; Peter W Groeneveld; Nimesh D Desai; Peter P Reese; Jacob T Gutsche; John G Augoustides; Mark D Neuman
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 2.  Perioperative assessment of myocardial deformation.

Authors:  Andra E Duncan; Andrej Alfirevic; Daniel I Sessler; Zoran B Popovic; James D Thomas
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Strain Assessment of Myocardial Function: A Better Approach or Just Fun and Games?

Authors:  Andra E Duncan
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 4.  [Intraoperative echocardiography: impact on surgical decision-making].

Authors:  E Schmid; M Nowak; K Unertl; P Rosenberger
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Isoflurane's Effect on Intraoperative Systolic Left Ventricular Performance in Cardiac Valve Surgery Patients.

Authors:  Ju Deok Kim; Ilsoon Son; Won Kyoung Kwon; Tae Yun Sung; Hanafi Sidik; Karam Kim; Hyun Kang; Jiyon Bang; Gwi Eun Yeo; Dong Kyu Lee; Tae Yop Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Transoesophageal echocardiography during coronary artery bypass procedures: impact on surgical planning.

Authors:  F Guarracino; C Cariello; L Tritapepe; L Doroni; R Baldassarri; A Danella; M Stefani
Journal:  HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth       Date:  2010
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.