OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic examination of the contralateral inguinal ring has recently been advocated to exclude contralateral hernia in young children. We report a modification using nondisposable cystoscopic equipment, which is quick and reliable. METHODS: Either an 8 or 10 F soft straight catheter or a cystoscope sheath is passed through the open hernia sac. Air is insufflated into the abdomen with a syringe. Once the pneumoperitoneum is completed, a 4-mm cystoscope lens (110 degrees) is used to inspect the contralateral ring. RESULTS: Twenty-four children between the ages of 6 weeks and 4 years (median, 6 months) underwent exploration for presumed unilateral inguinal hernia and laparoscopic examination of the contralateral inguinal ring. Thirteen patients (54%) had an open processus vaginalis and underwent contralateral inguinal herniorrhaphy. No false-positive or false-negative results were found, and there were no complications associated with the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: This method of laparoscopic examination of the contralateral inguinal ring using nondisposable cystoscopic equipment is rapid, safe, reliable, and cost effective in evaluating a contralateral patent processus vaginalis. Laparoscopic examination spares the need for formal surgical exploration in patients with a closed processus vaginalis.
OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic examination of the contralateral inguinal ring has recently been advocated to exclude contralateral hernia in young children. We report a modification using nondisposable cystoscopic equipment, which is quick and reliable. METHODS: Either an 8 or 10 F soft straight catheter or a cystoscope sheath is passed through the open hernia sac. Air is insufflated into the abdomen with a syringe. Once the pneumoperitoneum is completed, a 4-mm cystoscope lens (110 degrees) is used to inspect the contralateral ring. RESULTS: Twenty-four children between the ages of 6 weeks and 4 years (median, 6 months) underwent exploration for presumed unilateral inguinal hernia and laparoscopic examination of the contralateral inguinal ring. Thirteen patients (54%) had an open processus vaginalis and underwent contralateral inguinal herniorrhaphy. No false-positive or false-negative results were found, and there were no complications associated with the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: This method of laparoscopic examination of the contralateral inguinal ring using nondisposable cystoscopic equipment is rapid, safe, reliable, and cost effective in evaluating a contralateral patent processus vaginalis. Laparoscopic examination spares the need for formal surgical exploration in patients with a closed processus vaginalis.