Literature DB >> 8637998

Acromial morphology: relation to sex, age, symmetry, and subacromial enthesophytes.

J D Getz1, M P Recht, D W Piraino, J P Schils, B M Latimer, L M Jellema, N A Obuchowski.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate acromial shape in relation to age, sex, symmetry, and presence of subacromial enthesophytes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred ninety-four cadaveric scapulas were reviewed. Specimens were categorized by sex and age (age range, 20-89 years). Acromial morphology was typed according to the Bigliani classification: type I, flat; type II, curved; and type III, hooked. The presence and degree of subacromial enthesopathy was recorded. Selective radiographic correlation was obtained.
RESULTS: The relative percentages of acromial types I, II, and III were 22.8% (90 acromions), 68.5% (270 acromions), and 8.6% (34 acromions), respectively. There was a greater percentage of type III in men (10.2% [21 of 205] vs 6.9% [13 of 189] and type I in women (27.5% [52 of 189] vs 18.5% [38 of 205]). There was no relationship between acromial type and age (P = .667). Enthesophytes were most common in type III (20 [59%] of 34 acromions) versus type II (115 [42.6%] of 270 acromions) and type I (22 [24%] of 90 acromions). Acromial morphology was symmetric in 135 (70.7%) of 191 pairs of acromions and asymmetric in 56 pairs (29.3%).
CONCLUSION: Acromial shape does not vary significantly with age. It does, however, differ between sexes. The relative percentages of the types differ from previously reported values. Acromial shape tends to be symmetric. A trend between acromial type and the presence of enthesophytes is observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8637998     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.199.3.8637998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  6 in total

1.  Clinically significant skeletal variations of the shoulder and the wrist: role of MR imaging.

Authors:  J M Mellado; J Calmet; S Domènech; A Saurí
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-10-25       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Morphometric Evaluation of Adult Acromion Process in North Indian Population.

Authors:  Susmita Saha; Neelam Vasudeva
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-01-01

3.  Reliability of determining and measuring acromial enthesophytes.

Authors:  Keith M Baumgarten; James L Carey; Joseph A Abboud; Grant L Jones; John E Kuhn; Brian R Wolf; Robert H Brophy; Charles L Cox; Rick W Wright; Armando F Vidal; C Benjamin Ma; Eric C McCarty; G Brian Holloway; Edwin E Spencer; Warren R Dunn
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2011-07-13

4.  The correlation of supraspinatus outlet view with computed tomography for visualization of the anterior acromial undersurface.

Authors:  Viktor Feldman; Niv Marom; Meir Nyska; Eugene Kotz; Jonathan E J Koh; Vidal Barchilon
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-09-20

5.  Correction between the Morphology of Acromion and Acromial Angle in Chinese Population: A Study on 292 Scapulas.

Authors:  Xiaoguang Guo; Min Ou; Gang Yi; Bo Qin; Guoyou Wang; Shijie Fu; Lei Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-11-11       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Anatomical variants of the acromioclavicular joint influence its visibility in the standard MRI protocol in patients aged 18-31 years.

Authors:  Fredrik Helleberg; Piotr Sobecki; Rafał Józwiak; Paweł Szaro
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 1.354

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.