Literature DB >> 8637985

Congenital heart disease in adults and adolescents: comparative value of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography and MR imaging.

U C Hoppe1, B Dederichs, H J Deutsch, P Theissen, H Schicha, U Sechtem.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic value of transesophageal echocardiography and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with that of transthoracic echocardiography in the evaluation of congenital heart disease in adults and adolescents.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Corresponding transesophageal echocardiographic and MR images obtained in 61 patients (aged 14-74 years; 28 female, 33 male) with congenital cardiac abnormalities were analyzed retrospectively. Results were compared with those of transthoracic echocardiography in all patients and were confirmed by using cardiac catheterization (n = 41) and/or surgery (n = 41).
RESULTS: of the 344 abnormalities detected with at least one imaging technique, 259 were demonstrated with transthoracic echocardiography. Transesophageal echocardiography depicted the atrioventricular junction and atrial structures the best. MR imaging was the only technique to fully depict 31 extracardiac abnormalities. In complex cardiac defects, the combination of all three imaging techniques was best.
CONCLUSION: Transesophageal echocardiography and MR imaging are beneficial complementary imaging techniques in adults or adolescents with congenital heart disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8637985     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.199.3.8637985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  9 in total

Review 1.  [Echocardiographic evaluation in unoperated congenital heart disease in adults].

Authors:  A Geibel
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging in valvular heart disease.

Authors:  M Schmidt; J Crnac; B Dederichs; P Theissen; H Schicha; U Sechtem
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1997-06

Review 3.  [Cardiovascular MRT--replacement of diagnostic invasive coronary angiography?].

Authors:  S Kelle; E Nagel; E Fleck
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.743

4.  Real-time color-flow CMR in adults with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Erasmo de la Pena; Patricia K Nguyen; Krishna S Nayak; Phillip C Yang; David N Rosenthal; Bob S Hu; John M Pauly; Michael V McConnell
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 5.  MR imaging of congenital heart diseases in adolescents and adults.

Authors:  Y H Choe; I S Kang; S W Park; H J Lee
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2001 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Spectrum of congenital heart disease in a tropical environment: an echocardiography study.

Authors:  Mahmoud U Sani; Mariya Mukhtar-Yola; Kamilu M Karaye
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.798

7.  Quantitative MRI comparison of systemic hemodynamics in Mustard/Senning repaired patients and healthy volunteers at rest.

Authors:  Eric Laffon; Maria Jimenez; Valérie Latrabe; Dominique Ducassou; Alain Choussat; Roger Marthan; François Laurent
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  CASE REPORT Anomalies Associated With Congenitally Corrected Transposition of Great Arteries: Expect the Unexpected.

Authors:  Valay Parikh; Masood A Shariff; Faisal B Saiful; Syed Bilal Rizvi; Nikhil Goyal; Kourosh T Asgarian; Joseph T McGinn; Thomas Snyder; Vijay A Singh
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2013-01-24

9.  Routine clinical cardiovascular magnetic resonance in paediatric and adult congenital heart disease: patients, protocols, questions asked and contributions made.

Authors:  Sohrab Fratz; John Hess; Annika Schuhbaeck; Christine Buchner; Eva Hendrich; Stefan Martinoff; Heiko Stern
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 5.364

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.