Literature DB >> 8637678

Incidence and progression of nuclear opacities in the Longitudinal Study of Cataract.

M C Leske1, L T Chylack, S Y Wu, E Schoenfeld, Q He, J Friend, J Wolfe.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To estimate incidence and progression rates of nuclear opacities in the Longitudinal Study of Cataract, an epidemiologic study of the natural history of all types of lens opacities.
METHODS: The Lens Opacities Classification System III was used to assess longitudinal changes between baseline and follow-up lens photographs for the 764 Longitudinal Study of Cataract participants. Baseline data, collected until December 1988 as part of a case-control study, included color slit, retroillumination, and Scheimpflug photographs. The same data were collected by the longitudinal Study of Cataract at four subsequent visits at yearly intervals.
RESULTS: Among patients free of nuclear opacities at baseline, the incidence of new opacities was 6% after 2 years and 8% after 5 years of follow-up. The progression of pre-existing nuclear opacities was much higher. After 2 years, nuclear opacities had progressed in more than one third of the patients with pre-existing opacities; after 5 years, almost half had progressed. Older age was significantly related to higher incidence of new nuclear opacities, but not to progression of pre-existing opacities. Patients with other opacity types had higher nuclear incidence and progression rates.
CONCLUSIONS: In this clinic-based, older-patient population, new nuclear opacities developed in less than one tenth of the patients after 5 years of follow-up. In contrast, almost one half of the patients with pre-existing opacities had worsened after 5 years. These estimated rates can be used to plan intervention or other studies of nuclear changes in similar populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8637678     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30625-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  8 in total

1.  Racial differences in lens opacity incidence and progression: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation (SEE) study.

Authors:  Philip Storey; Beatriz Munoz; David Friedman; Sheila West
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Four-year incidence and progression of lens opacities: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study.

Authors:  Rohit Varma; Grace M Richter; Mina Torres; Athena W P Foong; Farzana Choudhury; Stanley P Azen
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  The assessment of lens opacities in clinical practice: results of a national survey.

Authors:  N A Frost; J M Sparrow
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Five year incidence of cataract surgery: the Blue Mountains Eye Study.

Authors:  J Panchapakesan; P Mitchell; K Tumuluri; E Rochtchina; S Foran; R G Cumming
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Automated, computerized, feature-based phenotype analysis of slit lamp images of the mouse lens.

Authors:  Jenny Yuen; Yi Li; Linda G Shapiro; John I Clark; Ernest Arnett; E Helene Sage; James F Brinkley
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 3.467

6.  Diclofenac sodium topical solution with dimethyl sulfoxide, a viable alternative to oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories in osteoarthritis: review of current evidence.

Authors:  Philip Fuller; Sanford Roth
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2011-07-11

7.  Cost effect of surgeon and patient discretion in regard to cataract surgery.

Authors:  Tyler D Oostra; Thomas F Mauger
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-12-10

8.  Refraction and Change in Refraction Over a 20-Year Period in the Beaver Dam Eye Study.

Authors:  Samantha Bomotti; Bryan Lau; Barbara E K Klein; Kristine E Lee; Ronald Klein; Priya Duggal; Alison P Klein
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.799

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.