Literature DB >> 8637096

Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Veterans Affairs medical centers.

A Kazmers1, L Jacobs, A Perkins, S M Lindenauer, E Bates.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was performed to define outcomes after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair in Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers during fiscal years 1991 through 1993.
METHODS: With VA patient treatment file data, patients were selected from diagnosis-related groups 110 and 111 and were then classified in a patient management category. In the categories of repair of nonruptured and ruptured AAA, mortality and postoperative complication rates were defined for patients who underwent AAA repair in VA medical centers during the 3-year study period.
RESULTS: Hospital mortality rates were 4.86% (166 of 3419) after repair of nonruptured AAA and 47.0% (126 of 268) after repair of ruptured AAA (p<0.001). Of 292 deaths after AAA repair, 136 (43.2%) followed repair of ruptured AAA, even though ruptured AAA comprised only 7.3% of total AAA surgical volume. AAA repairs were performed at 116 VA medical centers, with 31.8+/-23.1 (range, 1 to 140) procedures performed at each center. Although many lower-volume centers had excellent results, centers that performed >or=32 AAA repairs tended to have lower in-hospital mortality rates after repair of nonruptured AAA than those that performed <or=31 procedures (4.2%+/-3.5% compared with 6.7%+/-7.8%;p<0.05). Poisson regression analysis revealed an inverse relationship between the volume of AAA repairs and individual hospital mortality (p=0.001) and a direct relationship between illness severity and hospital mortality (p=0.008). The proportion of ruptured AAAs treated in a hospital was also directly related to individual hospital mortality rates (p<0.005). Postoperative complications were associated with an increased hospital mortality rate (11.7% with complication compared with 6.5% without; p<0.0001) and length of stay (23.6+/-17.1 days compared with 18.0+/-12.4 days; p<0.0001). In a logistic regression model, increased mortality rates after AAA repair were associated with hospital type (adjusted odds ratio [OR]=0.6), increasing age (OR=1.1), patient management category severity score (OR=2.2), hemorrhage (OR=2.3), myocardial infarction (OR=2.6), disseminated intravascular coagulation (OR=4.7), AAA rupture (OR=6.0), postoperative shock (OR=10.7), cardiopulmonary arrest (OR=15.4), central nervous system complications (OR=16.0) and urologic complications (OR=2.4).
CONCLUSIONS: Mortality rates after AAA repair in VA hospitals were comparable with those previously reported in other large series. Outcomes for veterans with AAA may improve by referring patients eligible for elective repair to VA medical centers with a greater operative volume or to lower-volume centers that have had excellent results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8637096     DOI: 10.1016/s0741-5214(96)70263-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  13 in total

1.  Implementation of a successful endovascular surgical program in a non-teaching tertiary-care centre in Ontario.

Authors:  Rod P N Willoughby; John A Fenton; Santosh R Pudupakkam; Robert A Greco; Evan W D Roberts; Guy DeRose; Stewart Kribs
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 2.  The case against volume as a measure of quality of surgical care.

Authors:  Shukri F Khuri; William G Henderson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Open versus endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a survey of Canadian vascular surgeons.

Authors:  Tara M Mastracci; Catherine M Clase; Philip J Devereaux; Claudio S Cinà
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Mortality after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: not where ... but how many and by whom.

Authors:  R B Galland; J H Wolfe
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  W C Sternbergh; M Yoselevitz; S R Money
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  1999-10

6.  Endoluminal graft repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms in high-risk patients and octogenarians: is it better than open repair?

Authors:  G A Sicard; B G Rubin; L A Sanchez; C A Keller; M W Flye; D Picus; D Hovsepian; E T Choi; P J Geraghty; R W Thompson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Volume of activity and occupancy rate in intensive care units. Association with mortality.

Authors:  Gaetano Lapichino; Luciano Gattinoni; Danilo Radrizzani; Bruno Simini; Guido Bertolini; Luca Ferla; Giovanni Mistraletti; Francesca Porta; Dinis R Miranda
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Ruptured aortic aneurysm: the decision not to operate.

Authors:  D F Hewin; W B Campbell
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Open surgery (OS) versus endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for hemodynamically stable and unstable ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA).

Authors:  Simeng Zhang; Jiaxuan Feng; Haiyan Li; Yongxue Zhang; Qingsheng Lu; Zaiping Jing
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  National outcomes for the treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: comparison of open versus endovascular repairs.

Authors:  Natalia Egorova; Jeannine Giacovelli; Giampaolo Greco; Annetine Gelijns; Craig K Kent; James F McKinsey
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.268

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.