Literature DB >> 8637013

Effect of GroEL on the re-folding kinetics of alpha-lactalbumin.

K Katsumata1, A Okazaki, K Kuwajima.   

Abstract

The effect of GroEL on the re-folding kinetics of apo- and holo-alpha-lactalbumin from the acidic molten globule state has been investigated by stopped-flow fluorescence measurements. GroEL retards the re-folding of apo-alpha-lactalbumin by interacting with the molten globule state of the protein. The binding constant was estimated to be in the order of 10(5) M-1 by analyzing the kinetic data quantitatively and was found to be much weaker than the binding between GroEL and disulfide-bond reduced alpha-lactalbumin, whose binding constant is in the order of 10(7) M-1. Our present results, together with the previous results, suggest that the state recognized by GroEL is not unique and that the binding strength varies with the state of a target protein. The binding between GroEL and the molten globule state of apo-alpha-lactalbumin becomes stronger with an increasing salt concentration; the binding constant is increased tenfold (from 10(5) to 10(6) M-1) by an increase in salt concentration from 0.05 to 0.25 M. The study of the effect of GroEL on the re-folding kinetics of holo-alpha-lactalbumin, which is represented by a bi-phasic process, shows that the slow phase is affected by GroEL in the same manner as observed in the apo-alpha-lactalbumin re-folding but that the fast phase is not affected by GroEL at all. This indicates that the binding rate of GroEL is faster than the slow phase but slower than the fast phase of the re-folding, and the bi-molecular rate constant of GroEL binding to the molten globule state of alpha-lactalbumin was estimated to be in the order of 10(6) M-1S-1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8637013     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  8 in total

1.  Factors governing the substrate recognition by GroEL chaperone: a sequence correlation approach.

Authors:  Tapan K Chaudhuri; Prateek Gupta
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 2.  GroEL-mediated protein folding: making the impossible, possible.

Authors:  Zong Lin; Hays S Rye
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.250

3.  Native-like structure of a protein-folding intermediate bound to the chaperonin GroEL.

Authors:  M S Goldberg; J Zhang; S Sondek; C R Matthews; R O Fox; A L Horwich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Protein folding: how the mechanism of GroEL action is defined by kinetics.

Authors:  C Frieden; A C Clark
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-05-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  GroEL-mediated protein folding.

Authors:  W A Fenton; A L Horwich
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Chaperonin-affected folding of globular proteins.

Authors:  K Kuwajima; T Makio; T Inobe
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.365

7.  Analysis of peptides and proteins in their binding to GroEL.

Authors:  Yali Li; Zhida Zheng; Andrew Ramsey; Lingling Chen
Journal:  J Pept Sci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.905

Review 8.  GroEL-assisted protein folding: does it occur within the chaperonin inner cavity?

Authors:  Victor V Marchenkov; Gennady V Semisotnov
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 6.208

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.