Literature DB >> 8636999

A mathematical analysis of in vitro molecular selection-amplification.

F Sun1, D Galas, M S Waterman.   

Abstract

We construct a mathematical model for in vitro molecular selection with amplification. Using DNA-protein binding as the illustrative example, we obtain an expression for the probability that a randomly selected molecule from the final in vitro selection products is a molecule with the highest binding affinity. Experiments of this type have been reported for several examples of DNA binding proteins. Our study requires a model of the DNA-protein binding constant between DNA molecules and the target protein. The relationship between binding constants and selection probabilities is presented under simplifying but reasonable assumptions. From our analysis, we find that for successful in vitro selection experiments there should be a certain relationship between the number of polymerase chain reaction cycles and the concentration of free protein. The results obtained should be widely applicable to a variety of selection-amplification procedures.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8636999     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  10 in total

1.  Diverse evolutionary trajectories characterize a community of RNA-cleaving deoxyribozymes: a case study into the population dynamics of in vitro selection.

Authors:  Kenny Schlosser; Yingfu Li
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-06-27       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  A mathematical analysis of SELEX.

Authors:  Howard A Levine; Marit Nilsen-Hamilton
Journal:  Comput Biol Chem       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 2.877

3.  Tracking the emergence of high affinity aptamers for rhVEGF165 during capillary electrophoresis-systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment using high throughput sequencing.

Authors:  Meng Jing; Michael T Bowser
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Controlling uncertainty in aptamer selection.

Authors:  Fabian Spill; Zohar B Weinstein; Atena Irani Shemirani; Nga Ho; Darash Desai; Muhammad H Zaman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Systematic evaluation of the dependence of deoxyribozyme catalysis on random region length.

Authors:  Tania E Velez; Jaydeep Singh; Ying Xiao; Emily C Allen; On Yi Wong; Madhavaiah Chandra; Sarah C Kwon; Scott K Silverman
Journal:  ACS Comb Sci       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 3.784

6.  Computational generation and screening of RNA motifs in large nucleotide sequence pools.

Authors:  Namhee Kim; Joseph A Izzo; Shereef Elmetwaly; Hin Hark Gan; Tamar Schlick
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 7.  Inside the Black Box: What Makes SELEX Better?

Authors:  Natalia Komarova; Alexander Kuznetsov
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  Influence of target concentration and background binding on in vitro selection of affinity reagents.

Authors:  Jinpeng Wang; Joseph F Rudzinski; Qiang Gong; H Tom Soh; Paul J Atzberger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A genotype-to-phenotype map of in vitro selected RNA-cleaving DNAzymes: implications for accessing the target phenotype.

Authors:  Kenny Schlosser; Jeffrey C F Lam; Yingfu Li
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Density-dependent cooperative non-specific binding in solid-phase SELEX affinity selection.

Authors:  Abdullah Ozer; Brian S White; John T Lis; David Shalloway
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 16.971

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.