Literature DB >> 8636729

The effect of experience of illness on health state valuations.

P Dolan1.   

Abstract

There is increasing interest in health status measurement and the relative weights that patients and the general public attach to different states of health and illness. One important question that has been raised is whether preferences differ according to the characteristics of the respondents, such as their experience of illness. The results presented in this article suggest that current health status has an important effect on the valuations attached to different health states, with those in poorer health generally giving higher valuations. Past experience of illness, on the other hand, appears to have a negligible effect on valuations. These findings pose real problems for policy makers. To the problem of whose values should count can be added the problem of when these values should count, since the results imply that different valuations may be given by the same respondent depending on how recent their experience of illness was.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8636729     DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00532-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  32 in total

1.  Feasibility, validity and test-retest reliability of scaling methods for health states: the visual analogue scale and the time trade-off.

Authors:  X Badia; S Monserrat; M Roset; M Herdman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Valuing health-related quality of life. Issues and controversies.

Authors:  P Dolan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Self-reported adolescent health status of extremely low birth weight children born 1992-1995.

Authors:  Maureen Hack; Mark Schluchter; Christopher B Forrest; H Gerry Taylor; Dennis Drotar; Grayson Holmbeck; Eric Youngstrom; Seunghee Margevicius; Laura Andreias
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Prospective study of health status preferences and changes in preferences over time in older adults.

Authors:  Terri R Fried; Amy L Byers; William T Gallo; Peter H Van Ness; Virginia R Towle; John R O'Leary; Joel A Dubin
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-04-24

5.  Understanding differences between self-ratings and population ratings for health in the EuroQOL.

Authors:  Ralph P Insinga; Dennis G Fryback
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  The stability of utility scores: test-retest reliability and the interpretation of utility scores in elective total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  D Feeny; C M Blanchard; J L Mahon; R Bourne; C Rorabeck; L Stitt; S Webster-Bogaert
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Community involvement in developing policies for genetic testing: assessing the interests and experiences of individuals affected by genetic conditions.

Authors:  Sarah E Gollust; Kira Apse; Barbara P Fuller; Paul Steven Miller; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  The effect of age, race and gender on preference scores for hypothetical health states.

Authors:  Eve Wittenberg; Elkan Halpern; Nomia Divi; Lisa A Prosser; Sally S Araki; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Dutch guidelines for economic evaluation: 'from good to better' in theory but further away from pharmaceuticals in practice?

Authors:  Livio Garattini; Anna Padula
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 10.  Using administrative data to study persons with disabilities.

Authors:  Lisa I Iezzoni
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.911

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.