Literature DB >> 8635199

Luminescence-based systems for detection of bacteria in the environment.

J I Prosser1, K Killham, L A Glover, E A Rattray.   

Abstract

The development of techniques for detection and tracking of microorganisms in natural environments has been accelerated by the requirement for assessment of the risks associated with environmental release of genetically engineered microbial inocula. Molecular marker systems are particularly appropriate for such studies and luminescence-based markers have the broadest range of applications, involving the introduction of prokaryotic (lux) or eukaryotic (luc) genes for the enzyme luciferase. Lux or luc genes can be detected on the basis of unique DNA sequences by gene probing and PCR amplification, but the major advantage of luminescence-based systems is the ability to detect light emitted by marked organisms or by luciferase activity in cell-free extracts. Luminescent colonies can be detected by eye, providing distinction from colonies of indigenous organisms, and the sensitivity of plate counting can be increased greatly by CCD imaging. Single cells or microcolonies of luminescent organisms can also be detected in environmental samples by CCD image-enhanced microscopy, facilitating study of their spatial distribution. The metabolic activity of luminescence-marked populations can be quantified by luminometry and does not require extraction of cells or laboratory growth. Metabolic activity, and potential activity, of marked organisms therefore can be measured during colonization of soil particles and plant material in real time without disturbing the colonization process. In comparison with traditional activity techniques, luminometry provides significant increases in sensitivity, accuracy, and, most importantly, selectivity, as activity can be measured in the presence of indigenous microbial communities. The sensitivity, speed, and convenience of luminescence measurements make this a powerful technique that is being applied to the study of an increasingly wide range of ecological problems. These include microbial survival and recovery, microbial predation, plant pathogenicity, phylloplane and rhizosphere colonization and reporting of gene expression in environmental samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8635199     DOI: 10.3109/07388559609147420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Biotechnol        ISSN: 0738-8551            Impact factor:   8.429


  7 in total

1.  Real-time monitoring of Escherichia coli O157:H7 adherence to beef carcass surface tissues with a bioluminescent reporter.

Authors:  G R Siragusa; K Nawotka; S D Spilman; P R Contag; C H Contag
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  How novel methods can help discover more information about foodborne pathogens.

Authors:  M W Griffiths
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  2000-05

3.  Rapid sublethal toxicity assessment using bioluminescent Caenorhabditis elegans, a novel whole-animal metabolic biosensor.

Authors:  Cristina Lagido; Debbie McLaggan; Aileen Flett; Jonathan Pettitt; L Anne Glover
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  A stable bioluminescent construct of Escherichia coli O157:H7 for hazard assessments of long-term survival in the environment.

Authors:  Jennifer M Ritchie; Graeme R Campbell; Jill Shepherd; Yvonne Beaton; Davey Jones; Ken Killham; Rebekka R E Artz
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Direct continuous method for monitoring biofilm infection in a mouse model.

Authors:  Jagath L Kadurugamuwa; Lin Sin; Eddie Albert; Jun Yu; Kevin Francis; Monica DeBoer; Michael Rubin; Carole Bellinger-Kawahara; T R Parr; Pamela R Contag
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Solid-phase contact assay that uses a lux-marked Nitrosomonas europaea reporter strain to estimate toxicity of bioavailable linear alkylbenzene sulfonate in soil.

Authors:  Kristian K Brandt; Anders Pedersen; Jan Sørensen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Drug detoxification dynamics explain the postantibiotic effect.

Authors:  Jaydeep K Srimani; Shuqiang Huang; Allison J Lopatkin; Lingchong You
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 11.429

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.