Literature DB >> 8634657

Endogenous estrogens and risk of breast cancer by estrogen receptor status: a prospective study in postmenopausal women.

A Zeleniuch-Jacquotte1, P Toniolo, M Levitz, R E Shore, K L Koenig, S Banerjee, P Strax, B S Pasternack.   

Abstract

A positive association between postmenopausal serum levels of total estradiol, percentage of free estradiol, and percentage of estradiol not bound to sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and breast cancer risk was recently reported by the New York University Women's Health Study (P. Toniolo et al., J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 87: 190-197, 1995). Data from this prospective study are used to assess whether the observed associations differ according to estrogen receptor (ER) status of the tumor. Between 1985 and 1991, 7063 postmenopausal women donated blood and completed questionnaires at a large breast cancer screening clinic in New York City. Before 1991, 130 cases of first primary breast cancer were identified by active follow-up of the cohort. For each case, two controls were selected, matching the case on age at first blood donation and length of storage of specimens. Biochemical analyses were performed on sera that had been stored at -80 degrees since sampling. ER information was abstracted from pathology reports. Separate statistical analyses were conducted of ER-positive, ER-negative, and ER-unknown groups (53, 23, and 54 matched sets, respectively). In each of the 3 groups, the mean estradiol and the mean percentage of free estradiol were greater (21-28% and 6-7%, respectively) in cases than in controls. Conversely, the mean percentage of estradiol bound to SHBG was 9-12% lower in cases than in controls. The logistic regression coefficients measuring the strength of the association between estradiol and its free and SHBG-bound fractions and breast cancer risk were similar in the ER-positive, ER-negative, and ER-unknown groups. These data suggest that in postmenopausal women, the association of endogenous estrogens with breast cancer risk is independent of the ER status of the tumor. This result is more compatible with the hypothesis of a progression from ER-positive to ER negative tumors than with the hypothesis that ER status identifies two distinct types of breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8634657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  14 in total

1.  Factors influencing the uptake of 18F-fluoroestradiol in patients with estrogen receptor positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Lanell M Peterson; Brenda F Kurland; Jeanne M Link; Erin K Schubert; Svetlana Stekhova; Hannah M Linden; David A Mankoff
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 2.  Sex hormone-binding globulin: not only a transport protein. What news is around the corner?

Authors:  N Fortunati
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Sex hormone binding globulin and risk of breast cancer: a Mendelian randomization study.

Authors:  Niki L Dimou; Nikos Papadimitriou; Dipender Gill; Sofia Christakoudi; Neil Murphy; Marc J Gunter; Ruth C Travis; Tim J Key; Renee T Fortner; Philip C Haycock; Sarah J Lewis; Kenneth Muir; Richard M Martin; Konstantinos K Tsilidis
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Circulating estrogens and progesterone during primiparous pregnancies and risk of maternal breast cancer.

Authors:  Annekatrin Lukanova; Helja-Marja Surcel; Eva Lundin; Marjo Kaasila; Hans-Ake Lakso; Helena Schock; Anika Husing; Rudolf Kaaks; Pentti Koskela; Kjell Grankvist; Eero Pukkala; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Matti Lehtinen; Paolo Toniolo
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Sex steroid hormone levels in breast adipose tissue and serum in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Roni T Falk; Elisabet Gentzschein; Frank Z Stanczyk; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Jonine D Figueroa; Olga B Ioffe; Jolanta Lissowska; Louise A Brinton; Mark E Sherman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Sex hormone levels and risks of estrogen receptor-negative and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers.

Authors:  Ghada N Farhat; Steven R Cummings; Rowan T Chlebowski; Neeta Parimi; Jane A Cauley; Thomas E Rohan; Alison J Huang; Mara Vitolins; F Allan Hubbell; Joann E Manson; Barbara B Cochrane; Dorothy S Lane; Jennifer S Lee
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Comparison of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, RIA, and ELISA methods for measurement of urinary estrogens.

Authors:  Jessica M Faupel-Badger; Barbara J Fuhrman; Xia Xu; Roni T Falk; Larry K Keefer; Timothy D Veenstra; Robert N Hoover; Regina G Ziegler
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 8.  Estrogen receptor alpha in human breast cancer: occurrence and significance.

Authors:  S Ali; R C Coombes
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.673

9.  Postmenopausal plasma sex hormone levels and breast cancer risk over 20 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Xuehong Zhang; Shelley S Tworoger; A Heather Eliassen; Susan E Hankinson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Effects of lifelong exercise training on mammary tumorigenesis induced by MNU in female Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Ana I Faustino-Rocha; Adelina Gama; Paula A Oliveira; Antonieta Alvarado; Maria J Neuparth; Rita Ferreira; Mário Ginja
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.