Literature DB >> 8632563

Cost consequences of surveillance, medical management or surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

T N Chirikos1, E Sanford.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The cost consequences of alternative treatment modalities for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were investigated. The present lifetime costs of watchful waiting, medical management and surgery alone and in various combinations were estimated for a synthetic cohort of men comprised of 5 age groupings.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Synthetic cohort models were constructed to follow men at different ages "analytically" for specific intervals and to calculate the cumulative health care costs associated with alternative BPH treatment regimens during those periods. These models accounted explicitly for survival probabilities, the use of different types of health care services and products, price changes for those services and products, failure rates of some therapies and a discount factor needed to compute the present value of the cost streams. The models were implemented with hospital discharge and other data on BPH incident cases in the state of Florida in approximately 1989.
RESULTS: The addition of medical management to the mix of therapies is likely to increase overall health care spending on BPH treatment, perhaps by a considerable amount. The cost-effectiveness of each type of BPH therapy differs by the age of the patient at which it is first initiated. All other parameters being equal, surgery appears to be more cost-effective at younger patient ages, while medical management has a cost advantage at older ages.
CONCLUSIONS: The cost implications of alternative BPH therapies are substantial, and warrant more detailed consideration by clinicians and health policy specialists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8632563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  9 in total

1.  Economic impact of surgical intervention in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  John M Hollingsworth; John T Wei
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2006

2.  [PDE5 inhibitors in treatment of benign prostatic syndrome].

Authors:  P Sandner; H Tinel; B Stelte-Ludwig; J Huetter; D Neuser; E Bischoff; E Ulbrich
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  The economics of benign prostatic hyperplasia and lower urinary tract symptoms in the United States.

Authors:  David A Taub; John T Wei
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Quality-of-life assessment in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: effects of various interventions.

Authors:  J E Batista-Miranda; M D Diez; P A Bertrán; H Villavicencio
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. A pharmacoeconomic perspective.

Authors:  L M Eri; K J Tveter
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 6.  Changing therapeutic regimens in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Clinical and economic considerations.

Authors:  H J Stoevelaar; J McDonnell
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Vardenafil in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Hartmut Porst; Peter Sandner; Ernst Ulbrich
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 8.  The long-term cost effectiveness of treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Rachael L DiSantostefano; Andrea K Biddle; John P Lavelle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 9.  The evolution of KTP laser vaporization of the prostate.

Authors:  Petros Sountoulides; Peter Tsakiris
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 2.759

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.