Literature DB >> 8632450

The three-dimensional structure of two mutants of the signal transduction protein CheY suggest its molecular activation mechanism.

L Bellsolell1, P Cronet, M Majolero, L Serrano, M Coll.   

Abstract

The three-dimensional crystal structures of the single mutant M17G and the triple mutant F14G-S15G-M17G of the response regulator protein CheY have been determined to 2.3 and 1.9 angstrom, respectively. Both mutants bind the essential Mg2+ cation as determined by the changes in stability, but binding does not cause the intrinsic fluorescence quenching of W58 observed in the wild-type protein. The loop beta4-alpha4 appears to be very flexible in both mutants and helix alpha4, which starts at N94 in the native Mg2+-CheY and at K91 in the native apo-CheY, starts in both mutants at residue K92. The side-chain of K109 appears to be more mobile because of the space freed by the M17G mutation. In the triple mutant the main chain of K109 and adjacent residues (loop beta5-alpha5) is displaced almost by 2 angstrom affecting the main chain at residues T87 to E89 (C terminus of beta4). The triple mutant structure has a Mg2+ bound at the active site, but although the Mg2+ coordination is similar to that of the native Mg2+-CheY, the structural consequences of the metal binding are quite different. It seems that the mutations have disrupted the mechanism of movement transmission observed in the native protein. We suggest that the side-chain of K109, packed between V86, A88 and M17 in the native protein, slides forwards and backwards upon activation and deactivation dragging the main chain at the loop beta5-alpha5 and triggering larger movements at the functional surface of the protein.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8632450     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  7 in total

1.  Structural basis of a protein partner switch that regulates the general stress response of α-proteobacteria.

Authors:  Julien Herrou; Grant Rotskoff; Yun Luo; Benoît Roux; Sean Crosson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Altered recognition mutants of the response regulator PhoB: a new genetic strategy for studying protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  A Haldimann; M K Prahalad; S L Fisher; S K Kim; C T Walsh; B L Wanner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A structural model of anti-anti-σ inhibition by a two-component receiver domain: the PhyR stress response regulator.

Authors:  Julien Herrou; Robert Foreman; Aretha Fiebig; Sean Crosson
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 3.501

4.  Computation of conformational coupling in allosteric proteins.

Authors:  Brian A Kidd; David Baker; Wendy E Thomas
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Crystal structures of beryllium fluoride-free and beryllium fluoride-bound CheY in complex with the conserved C-terminal peptide of CheZ reveal dual binding modes specific to CheY conformation.

Authors:  Jayita Guhaniyogi; Victoria L Robinson; Ann M Stock
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-04-06       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Structure of the Response Regulator NsrR from Streptococcus agalactiae, Which Is Involved in Lantibiotic Resistance.

Authors:  Sakshi Khosa; Astrid Hoeppner; Holger Gohlke; Lutz Schmitt; Sander H J Smits
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Prediction of allosteric sites and mediating interactions through bond-to-bond propensities.

Authors:  B R C Amor; M T Schaub; S N Yaliraki; M Barahona
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 14.919

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.