Literature DB >> 8631960

The kinetic factors that determine the affinity and selectivity for slow binding inhibition of human prostaglandin H synthase 1 and 2 by indomethacin and flurbiprofen.

O H Callan1, O Y So, D C Swinney.   

Abstract

We present here for the first time a method for determining the rate constants associated with slow binding inhibition of prostaglandin H synthase (PGHS). The rate constants were determined by a method using initial steady-state conditions, which minimize the impact of catalytic autoinactivation of the enzyme. The currently available methods for determining the kinetic constants associated with slow binding enzyme inhibition do not distinguish between rate decreases due to enzyme inhibition or due to autoinactivation of the enzyme. A mathematical model was derived assuming a rapid reversible formation of an initial enzyme-inhibitor complex (EI) followed by a slow reversible formation of a second enzyme-inhibitor complex (EI*). The two enzyme inhibitor complexes are assumed to be in slow equilibrium. This method was used to evaluate the kinetic parameters associated with the binding and selectivity of the nonsteroidal antinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), flurbiprofen and indomethacin. The KI values associated with the formation of the first reversible complex (EI) for flurbiprofen with PGHS1 and PGHS2 were 0.53 +/- 0. 06 and 0.61 +/- 0.08 microM, respectively; the rate constants for the forward isomerization, k2, into the second reversible complex (EI*) were 0.97 +/- 0.99 and 0.11 +/- 0.01 s-1, respectively, and rates of the reverse isomerization from EI*, k-2, were 0.031 +/- 0.004 and 0.0082 +/- 0.0008 s-1, respectively. Indomethacin was estimated to form the EI complex with the same affinity for both PGHS1 and PGHS2, 10.0 +/- 2.8 microM and 11.2 +/- 2.0 microM, respectively, and dissociate from EI* at approximately the same rate 0.0011 +/- 0.0002 s-1 and 0.0031 +/- 0.0003 s-1, respectively. However, the rate of isomerization into EI* from EI was much greater for PGHS1 than PGHS2, 0.33 +/- 0.08 s-1 as compared with 0.034 +/- 0.004 s-1. These results show that the overall affinity for the inhibition of PGHS1 versus PGHS2 was 30-fold greater for indomethacin (KI* = 0.032 +/- 0.005 and 1.02 +/- 0.08 microM, respectively) and 3-fold greater for flurbiprofen (KI* = 0.017 +/- 0.002 and 0.045 +/- 0.004 microM, respectively). The results also show that for both PGHS1 and PGHS2, flurbiprofen was bound tighter to the initial EI complex than indomethacin; however, the rate of dissociation from EI* was slower for indomethacin than flurbiprofen. The rate of the forward isomerization to EI* is primarily responsible for the selectivity of both NSAIDs for PGHS1. This analysis shows the quantitative importance of the different kinetic parameters upon the overall binding affinity of these NSAIDs and should greatly assist in our understanding of the structural interactions that promote enzyme-inhibitor binding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8631960     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.271.7.3548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  20 in total

1.  A high level of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor selectivity is associated with a reduced interference of platelet cyclooxygenase-1 inactivation by aspirin.

Authors:  M Ouellet; D Riendeau; M D Percival
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A three-step kinetic mechanism for selective inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase-2 by diarylheterocyclic inhibitors.

Authors:  M C Walker; R G Kurumbail; J R Kiefer; K T Moreland; C M Koboldt; P C Isakson; K Seibert; J K Gierse
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 3.  On the different experimental manifestations of two-state 'induced-fit' binding of drugs to their cellular targets.

Authors:  Georges Vauquelin; Isabelle Van Liefde; David C Swinney
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Synthesis and kinetic analysis of some phosphonate analogs of cyclophostin as inhibitors of human acetylcholinesterase.

Authors:  Supratik Dutta; Raj K Malla; Saibal Bandyopadhyay; Christopher D Spilling; Cynthia M Dupureur
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Kinetic basis for selective inhibition of cyclo-oxygenases.

Authors:  J K Gierse; C M Koboldt; M C Walker; K Seibert; P C Isakson
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1999-05-01       Impact factor: 3.857

6.  The structural and electronical factors that contribute affinity for the time-dependent inhibition of PGHS-1 by indomethacin, diclofenac and fenamates.

Authors:  R Pouplana; C Pérez; J Sánchez; J J Lozano; P Puig-Parellada
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Preclinical pharmacology of lumiracoxib: a novel selective inhibitor of cyclooxygenase-2.

Authors:  Ronald Esser; Carol Berry; Zhengming Du; Janet Dawson; Alyson Fox; Roger A Fujimoto; William Haston; Earl F Kimble; Julie Koehler; Jane Peppard; Elizabeth Quadros; Joseph Quintavalla; Karen Toscano; Laszlo Urban; John van Duzer; Xiaoli Zhang; Siyuan Zhou; Paul J Marshall
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Dual cyclooxygenase-fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitor exploits novel binding interactions in the cyclooxygenase active site.

Authors:  Michael C Goodman; Shu Xu; Carol A Rouzer; Surajit Banerjee; Kebreab Ghebreselasie; Marco Migliore; Daniele Piomelli; Lawrence J Marnett
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Role of Tyr348 in Tyr385 radical dynamics and cyclooxygenase inhibitor interactions in prostaglandin H synthase-2.

Authors:  Corina E Rogge; Bryant Ho; Wen Liu; Richard J Kulmacz; Ah-Lim Tsai
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Detergents profoundly affect inhibitor potencies against both cyclo-oxygenase isoforms.

Authors:  Marc Ouellet; Jean-Pierre Falgueyret; M David Percival
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 3.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.