Literature DB >> 8631850

RANTES and MCP-3 antagonists bind multiple chemokine receptors.

J H Gong1, M Uguccioni, B Dewald, M Baggiolini, I Clark-Lewis.   

Abstract

Antagonists of multiple chemokines could be more effective than inhibitors of specific chemokines for controlling cell migration and inflammation. To attempt to identify such antagonists we characterized a number of truncated analogs of regulated on activation normal T cell expressed protein (RANTES), monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-3, and MCP-1. On the basis of their ability to compete for binding of their parent chemokines, three analogs were selected for cross-reactivity studies: RANTES (9-68), MCP-3 (10-76), and MCP-1 (9-76). These analogs bound to THP-1 monocytic cells with dissociation constants that were within 4-6-fold of their native counterparts, but they did not promote detectable chemotaxis of THP-1 cells or enzyme release from purified human monocytes. The RANTES (9-68) analog competed for the binding and inhibited the activities of all three chemokines. In contrast, native RANTES was specific for RANTES binding sites. However, truncation of either MCP-1 or MCP-3 did not change their respective binding specificity. MCP-3 and MCP-3 (10-76) competed for binding of all three labeled chemokines. MCP-1 (9-76) competed strongly for binding of labeled MCP-1, but only weakly for the other two labeled ligands and inhibited the activities induced by MCP-1 and MCP-3 but not RANTES. Although RANTES (9-68) and MCP-3 (10-76) inhibited all three chemokines, the RANTES analog was significantly more potent for RANTES-induced activity. The results indicate that NH2-terminal residues partly determine the receptor specificity of RANTES, and deletions within this region permit binding to multiple chemokine receptors. The findings suggest the feasibility of design of high affinity multi-specific CC chemokine antagonists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8631850     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.271.18.10521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  24 in total

1.  Molecular requirements for inhibition of the chemokine receptor CCR8--probe-dependent allosteric interactions.

Authors:  P C Rummel; K N Arfelt; L Baumann; T J Jenkins; S Thiele; H R Lüttichau; A Johnsen; J Pease; S Ghosh; R Kolbeck; M M Rosenkilde
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  The solution structure of the anti-HIV chemokine vMIP-II.

Authors:  A C Liwang; Z X Wang; Y Sun; S C Peiper; P J Liwang
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 3.  Structural basis of chemokine receptor function--a model for binding affinity and ligand selectivity.

Authors:  Lavanya Rajagopalan; Krishna Rajarathnam
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 4.  HIV and the chemokine system: 10 years later.

Authors:  Paolo Lusso
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 5.  Chemokines in tumor angiogenesis and metastasis.

Authors:  Seema Singh; Anguraj Sadanandam; Rakesh K Singh
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 6.  Chemokine receptors and chemokines in HIV infection.

Authors:  A Garzino-Demo; A L DeVico; R C Gallo
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.317

Review 7.  Chemokines: understanding their role in T-lymphocyte biology.

Authors:  S G Ward; J Westwick
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 3.857

8.  Backbone dynamics of the human CC chemokine eotaxin: fast motions, slow motions, and implications for receptor binding.

Authors:  M P Crump; L Spyracopoulos; P Lavigne; K S Kim; I Clark-lewis; B D Sykes
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Molecular determinants for CC-chemokine recognition by a poxvirus CC-chemokine inhibitor.

Authors:  B T Seet; R Singh; C Paavola; E K Lau; T M Handel; G McFadden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Control of feeding behavior in C. elegans by human G protein-coupled receptors permits screening for agonist-expressing bacteria.

Authors:  Michelle S Teng; Paul Shadbolt; Andrew G Fraser; Gert Jansen; John McCafferty
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.