Literature DB >> 8631538

Preoperative evaluation of D-dimer and CA 125 levels in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian masses.

A Gadducci1, U Baicchi, R Marrai, M Ferdeghini, R Bianchi, V Facchini.   

Abstract

Plasma levels of D-dimer (DD) and CA 125 were measured preoperatively in 121 patients with ovarian masses submitted to laparotomy. DD and CA 125 levels were higher in the 56 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer than in the 65 patients with benign ovarian disease (P < 0.0001). The logistic regression procedure showed that both DD assay (cutoff 416 ng/ml) and CA 125 assay (cutoff 65 U/ml) were significant predictive variables for malignancy (P = 0.0001). The concordance between predicted probabilities and observed responses was 75.7% for DD, 72.1% for CA 125, and 90.8% for Dd and CA 125. It is worth noting that DD was increased ( > 416 ng/ml) in 73% of FIGO stage I patients, whereas CA 125 was above 65 U/ml in only 33.3%. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the tests in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian masses were as follows: 76.8, 93.8, 91.5, and 82.4%, respectively, for CA 125; 94.6, 76.9, 77.9, and 94.3%, respectively, for the combination CA 125 or DD; and 73.2, 100.0, 100.0, and 81.3%, respectively, for the combination CA 125 and DD. The combination CA 125 and DD seems to be a useful diagnostic tool to differentiate benign from malignant ovarian masses. Elevated preoperative levels of both antigens are invariably associated with a postsurgical diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8631538     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1996.0025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  11 in total

1.  Plasma D-dimer level in patients with colorectal cancer: its role as a tumor marker.

Authors:  M Oya; Y Akiyama; T Yanagida; S Akao; H Ishikawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Nidogen-2: a new serum biomarker for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Cynthia Kuk; C Geeth Gunawardana; Antoninus Soosaipillai; Hiroshi Kobayashi; Lin Li; Yingye Zheng; Eleftherios P Diamandis
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 3.281

3.  D-dimer levels as a prognostic factor for determining oncological outcomes in musculoskeletal sarcoma.

Authors:  Takeshi Morii; Kazuo Mochizuki; Takashi Tajima; Shoichi Ichimura; Kazuhiko Satomi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 4.  Role of tumour markers in monitoring epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  T Meyer; G J Rustin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 5.  Clinical significance of plasma D-dimer in ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiacong Wu; Ziyi Fu; Guangquan Liu; Pengfei Xu; Juan Xu; Xuemei Jia
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Development and validation of a model that includes two ultrasound parameters and the plasma D-dimer level for predicting malignancy in adnexal masses: an observational study.

Authors:  Maciej Stukan; Michał Badocha; Karol Ratajczak
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Perioperative d-dimer levels in patients with musculoskeletal tumors.

Authors:  Takeshi Morii; Kazuo Mochizuki; Masazumi Kotera; Naoaki Imakiire; Takahiro Moriwaki; Kazuhiko Satomi
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2008-08-26

8.  Concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the serum of patients with suspected ovarian cancer.

Authors:  A Obermair; C Tempfer; L Hefler; O Preyer; A Kaider; R Zeillinger; S Leodolter; C Kainz
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  High incidence of silent venous thromboembolism before treatment in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  T Satoh; A Oki; K Uno; M Sakurai; H Ochi; S Okada; R Minami; K Matsumoto; Y O Tanaka; H Tsunoda; S Homma; H Yoshikawa
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Diagnostic Accuracy of the ADNEX Model for Ovarian Cancer at the 15% Cut-Off Value: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiaotong Huang; Ziwei Wang; Meiqin Zhang; Hong Luo
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.