Literature DB >> 8631037

Prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice: a commentary on current treatment patterns in six European countries in relation to published recommendations.

J Shepherd1, M Pratt.   

Abstract

Market research surveys can be a source of up-to-date information about current clinical practices. Data from one such survey, Cholesterol Monitor (made available by Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, N.J., USA) was examined to ascertain to what extent management of cholesterol in six European countries conforms with the advice of the joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology, European Atherosclerosis Society and European Society of Hypertension for prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD). Rates of cholesterol testing in patients with CHD varied from less than 50% in the UK to more than 80% in France and Italy. Across Europe, the average cholesterol levels in surveyed patients was 6 mmol/l, and the average intervention level was 7.5 mmol/l. In all countries, there was evidence of a substantial treatment gap, even among high-risk patients with established CHD. This gap took the form of non-treatment of a proportion of patients whose risk status merited intervention on the basis of expert recommendations and the results of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (in which sustained lowering of total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduced total and coronary mortality in patients with baseline total cholesterol as low as 5.5 mmol/l). The findings indicate that a concerted programme of physician education is required if the recommendations of the joint Task Force are to be put into effect, and if the present nontreatment/undertreatment of cholesterol in high-risk patients is to be corrected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8631037     DOI: 10.1159/000177051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiology        ISSN: 0008-6312            Impact factor:   1.869


  3 in total

1.  Poor compliance: the hidden risk factor.

Authors:  J C LaRosa
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 2.  Simvastatin. A reappraisal of its cost effectiveness in dyslipidaemia and coronary heart disease.

Authors:  K L Goa; L B Barradell; D McTavish
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Hyperlipidaemia: differences in management practices and attitudes in two regions in Europe--Sicily and the Stockholm area.

Authors:  B Danielsson; F Vancheri; H Aberg; L E Strender
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.082

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.