Literature DB >> 8630531

Comparison of preservation techniques for DNA extraction from hymenopterous insects.

N Dillon1, A D Austin, E Bartowsky.   

Abstract

Two species of parasitic wasp, Venturia canescens and Leptomastix dactylopii, were killed and preserved by various methods used for Hymenoptera and in mass-collecting devices. Total genomic DNA was subsequently extracted and a 524 bp fragment of the mitochondrial 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplified by PCR. Results for these techniques were compared with that for fresh material and museum specimens. Material from -80 degrees C, 100% ethanol, air-drying in a desiccator, and critical-point dried from alcohol all yielded good results after short and long-term storage, as did specimens from ethylene glycol but not formalin (the latter two being commonly used in pitfall and flight intercept traps). Specimens killed in ethyl acetate vapour and air-dried yielded very degraded DNA which did not successfully PCR. The use of this killing agent is a likely reason for previous reports of inconsistent results obtained from museum specimens, and the now widespread use of critical-point drying of wasps and other insects from alcohol is advocated as a potential source of DNA from rare taxa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8630531     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.1996.tb00036.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Insect Mol Biol        ISSN: 0962-1075            Impact factor:   3.585


  18 in total

1.  Comparison of preservation methods of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus (Acari: Ixodidae) for reliable DNA amplification by PCR.

Authors:  Jupiter Mtambo; Wim Van Bortel; Maxime Madder; Patricia Roelants; Thierry Backeljau
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.132

2.  Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis of closely related wild and captive tsetse fly (Glossina morsitans morsitans) populations.

Authors:  Gurdeep K Lall; Alistair C Darby; Bjorn Nystedt; Ewan T Macleod; Richard P Bishop; Susan C Welburn
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 3.  Forensic entomology.

Authors:  Jens Amendt; Roman Krettek; Richard Zehner
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2004-01-16

Review 4.  Sarcoptes mite from collection to DNA extraction: the lost realm of the neglected parasite.

Authors:  S Alasaad; L Rossi; R C Soriguer; L Rambozzi; D Soglia; J M Pérez; X Q Zhu
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 2.289

5.  Traditional water mite fixatives and their compatibility with later DNA studies.

Authors:  Isabel Rey; Beatriz A Dorda; Antonio G Valdecasas
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Storage and shipping of tissue samples for DNA analyses: A case study on earthworms.

Authors:  Daniela Straube; Anita Juen
Journal:  Eur J Soil Biol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.846

7.  Genomic treasure troves: complete genome sequencing of herbarium and insect museum specimens.

Authors:  Martijn Staats; Roy H J Erkens; Bart van de Vossenberg; Jan J Wieringa; Ken Kraaijeveld; Benjamin Stielow; József Geml; James E Richardson; Freek T Bakker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  DNA Quantity and Quality in Remnants of Traffic-Killed Specimens of an Endangered Longhorn Beetle: A Comparison of Different Methods.

Authors:  Hans-Peter Rusterholz; Sylvain Ursenbacher; Armin Coray; Urs Weibel; Bruno Baur
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.857

9.  Preserving and vouchering butterflies and moths for large-scale museum-based molecular research.

Authors:  Soowon Cho; Akito Y Kawahara; Samantha W Epstein; Kim Mitter; Chris A Hamilton; David Plotkin; Charles Mitter
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Searching for the Optimal Sampling Solution: Variation in Invertebrate Communities, Sample Condition and DNA Quality.

Authors:  Martin M Gossner; Jan-Frederic Struwe; Sarah Sturm; Simeon Max; Michelle McCutcheon; Wolfgang W Weisser; Sharon E Zytynska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.