Literature DB >> 8630311

The Burch colposuspension for women with and without detrusor overactivity.

M Colombo1, G Zanetta, D Vitobello, R Milani.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of the Burch colposuspension in women with stress urinary incontinence and detrusor overactivity with those obtained in women with stress incontinence and stable bladders. Additionally, to analyse the value of two detrusor instability indexes and of standard cystometric parameters in predicting the surgical outcome.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Secondary referral centre Urodynamics Unit, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza. SAMPLE: Forty-four women with detrusor overactivity (21 with low compliance bladder and 23 with detrusor instability) and 44 with stable bladders. They were matched for age, parity, dystocia, menopause, body mass index, previous vaginal surgery, heavy work, urethral functional length and maximum urethral closure pressure.
RESULTS: At two years follow up, the cure rate of stress incontinence was 95% in the control group (patients with stable bladders) and 75% in detrusor overactivity group (odds ratio 0.1, 95% confidence interval 0.01-0.9, P = 0.02). No significant differences were observed between cured and failed patients according to both detrusor instability indexes. Likewise, mean pre-operative standard cystometric values of cured and failed patients showed no differences.
CONCLUSIONS: Although results were better in women with stable bladders, we believe that the success of the Burch colposuspension in cases with mixed incontinence should be considered satisfactory. No pre-operative cystometric parameter consistently predicting the surgical outcome on stress incontinence was identified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8630311     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09715.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0306-5456


  7 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacological management of women with mixed urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Hashim Hashim; Paul Abrams
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Impact of surgery for stress incontinence on morbidity. Effects of confounding variables on outcomes of incontinence surgery must be considered.

Authors:  V Khullar; L Cardozo; K Boos; J Bidmead; C Kelleher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-07-11

Review 3.  Mixed urinary incontinence: international urogynecological association research and development committee opinion.

Authors:  Dorothy Kammerer-Doak; Diaa E E Rizk; Olanrewaju Sorinola; Wael Agur; Sharif Ismail; Tony Bazi
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  [Stress incontinence and mixed incontinence].

Authors:  S Schumacher; S C Müller
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  The value of preoperative urodynamics according to gynecologists and urologists with special interest in stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Sanne A L van Leijsen; Kirsten B Kluivers; Ben Willem J Mol; Mark E Vierhout; John P F A Heesakkers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 6.  The impact of detrusor overactivity on the management of stress urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  H Henry Lai; Michael Simon; Timothy B Boone
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.862

Review 7.  Treatment of mixed urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Alex Gomelsky; Roger R Dmochowski
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2011-09-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.