Literature DB >> 8630149

Outcome of patients who refused out-of-hospital medical assistance.

J L Burstein1, M C Henry, J Alicandro, D Gentile, H C Thode, J E Hollander.   

Abstract

Activation of the emergency medical services (EMS) system does not always result in transport of a patient to the hospital. This study assessed the outcomes of patients who refused medical assistance in the field, to determine if refusal of medical assistance (RMA) is associated with poor outcomes. Four high-volume suburban volunteer ambulance corps participated in the study. Consecutive patients who refused medical assistance were prospectively enrolled. Medical and identifying data were collected for each patient. Telephone follow-up was conducted to determine the patient's condition and if the patient sought further care after RMA. Primary endpoints were whether the patient sought further care, was admitted to a hospital, or died subsequent to RMA. Follow-up was successfully obtained for 199 of 321 patients enrolled (62%). Of these 199 patients, 95 (48%) sought further medical care within 1 week for the same complaint, with 13 being admitted to the hospital. Six of the 13 admitted patients had chief complaints of a cardiac or respiratory nature. One patient died during hospital admission. Even if none of the patients lost to follow-up had sought further care, a substantial number of patients who refuse out-of-hospital medical assistance seek further care. Some of these patients require hospital admission, especially those with cardiac or respiratory complaints. Efforts to minimize RMA should be especially focused on patients with such complaints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8630149     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-6757(96)90007-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  6 in total

Review 1.  On-scene alternatives for emergency ambulance crews attending patients who do not need to travel to the accident and emergency department: a review of the literature.

Authors:  H A Snooks; J Dale; C Hartley-Sharpe; M Halter
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  The forgotten trauma patient: outcomes for injured patients evaluated by emergency medical services but not transported to the hospital.

Authors:  Kristan Staudenmayer; Renee Hsia; Ewen Wang; Karl Sporer; David Ghilarducci; David Spain; Robert Mackersie; John Sherck; Richard Kline; Craig Newgard
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.313

3.  Emergency (999) calls to the ambulance service that do not result in the patient being transported to hospital: an epidemiological study.

Authors:  P J Marks; T D Daniel; O Afolabi; G Spiers; J S Nguyen-Van-Tam
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Are they really refusing to travel? A qualitative study of prehospital records.

Authors:  Deborah Shaw; Jane V Dyas; Jo Middlemass; Anne Spaight; Maureen Briggs; Sarah Christopher; A Niroshan Siriwardena
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2006-09-19

Review 5.  A patient-safety and professional perspective on non-conveyance in ambulance care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Remco H A Ebben; Lilian C M Vloet; Renate F Speijers; Nico W Tönjes; Jorik Loef; Thomas Pelgrim; Margreet Hoogeveen; Sivera A A Berben
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Emergency Transport Refusal during the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Gyeonggi Province, South Korea.

Authors:  Min Young Ryu; Hang A Park; Sangsoo Han; Hye Ji Park; Choung Ah Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.614

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.