Literature DB >> 8629292

Delayed graft function in the absence of rejection has no long-term impact. A study of cadaver kidney recipients with good graft function at 1 year after transplantation.

C Troppmann1, K J Gillingham, R W Gruessner, D L Dunn, W D Payne, J S Najarian, A J Matas.   

Abstract

We previously reported that delayed graft function (DGF) in the absence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (Rej) had no effect on outcome of primary cadaver kidney transplantation (TX). By contrast, DGF in combination with Rej strongly predicted poor long-term graft survival. We asked whether this poor long-term outcome was due to early graft loss associated with DGF, or to an ongoing process leading to late graft loss. To answer this question, we studied a subset of 298 cadaver kidney transplant recipients who had not suffered early graft loss and had a serum creatinine level < or = 2.0 mg/dl at 1 year after TX. The incidence of DGF (defined by dialysis during the first week after TX) in this subset was 19%. DGF was associated with cold ischemia time >24 hr (P = 0.0003) and Rej (P = 0.06). For grafts with versus without DGF, the incidence of late acute Rej (>1 year after TX) was similar. Actuarial graft survival was similar for Rej-free recipients with versus without DGF (P = 0.9) and was worse for those with Rej and no DGF (P < 0.02). Importantly, however, in our recipients who all had a serum creatinine level < or = 2.0 mg/dl at 1 year after TX, the worst long-term outcome was noted in the subgroup with both DGF and Rej (P < 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, DGF was also only a risk factor in combination with Rej (P = 0.002, relative risk = 3.7), while a 0-antigen HLA mismatch had no impact. Patient survival decreased for recipients with both DGF and Rej by univariate (P = 0.009) and multivariate (P = 0.02, relative risk = 2.9) analyses. We conclude that DGF without Rej has no impact on long-term survival. However, our data for recipients with both DGF and Rej suggest that a chronic ongoing process leads to late graft failure. Further research is necessary to identify the exact pathophysiology of this process, which appears to be, at least in part, HLA antigen independent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8629292     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199605150-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  14 in total

Review 1.  Marked variation in the definition and diagnosis of delayed graft function: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sri G Yarlagadda; Steven G Coca; Amit X Garg; Mona Doshi; Emilio Poggio; Richard J Marcus; Chirag R Parikh
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 5.992

2.  Delayed graft function and the risk of acute rejection in the modern era of kidney transplantation.

Authors:  W Kelly Wu; Olusegun Famure; Yanhong Li; S Joseph Kim
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 10.612

3.  Optimizing Graft Survival by Pretreatment of the Donor.

Authors:  Sandy Feng
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Center-level variation in the development of delayed graft function after deceased donor kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Babak J Orandi; Nathan T James; Erin C Hall; Kyle J Van Arendonk; Jacqueline M Garonzik-Wang; Natasha Gupta; Robert A Montgomery; Niraj M Desai; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Outcomes From Right Versus Left Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplants: A US National Cohort Study.

Authors:  Sanjay Kulkarni; Guo Wei; Wei Jiang; Licia A Lopez; Chirag R Parikh; Isaac E Hall
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 8.860

6.  Ischemia/reperfusion injury in human kidney transplantation: an immunohistochemical analysis of changes after reperfusion.

Authors:  D D Koo; K I Welsh; J A Roake; P J Morris; S V Fuggle
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.307

7.  Is delayed graft function causally associated with long-term outcomes after kidney transplantation? Instrumental variable analysis.

Authors:  Neel M Butala; Peter P Reese; Mona D Doshi; Chirag R Parikh
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  A comparison of three induction therapies on patients with delayed graft function after kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Afia Umber; Mary Killackey; Anil Paramesh; Yongjun Liu; Huaizhen Qin; Muhammad Atiq; Belinda Lee; Arnold Brent Alper; Eric Simon; Joseph Buell; Rubin Zhang
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2016-04-09       Impact factor: 3.902

Review 9.  Non heart-beating donors in England.

Authors:  Eleazar Chaib
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.365

10.  Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in kidney transplantation is an early marker of graft dysfunction and is associated with one-year renal function.

Authors:  Isabel Fonseca; José Carlos Oliveira; Manuela Almeida; Madalena Cruz; Anabela Malho; La Salete Martins; Leonídio Dias; Sofia Pedroso; Josefina Santos; Luísa Lobato; António Castro Henriques; Denisa Mendonça
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2013-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.