Literature DB >> 8629289

Xenograft rejection of porcine islet-like cell clusters in normal and natural killer cell-depleted mice.

A Karlsson-Parra1, A Ridderstad, A C Wallgren, E Möller, H G Ljunggren, O Korsgren.   

Abstract

Fetal porcine islet-like cell clusters (ICC) were transplanted under the renal capsule of normoglycemic normal or athymic (nu/nu) C57BL/6 mice. Control animals were implanted with allogeneic minced kidney tissue from C57BL/Ks mice. The animals were killed 6 or 14 days after transplantation and the grafts were processed for flow cytometric analyses or immunohistochemistry. Xenograft destruction was evident in normal mice on day 6 after transplantation. The majority of infiltrating cells were macrophage-like cells expressing the F4/80 antigen. Lymphocytes expressing the CD3 antigen were in minority and mainly located in the peripheral parts of the ICC xenograft. The frequency and distribution of CD4+ cells were found to resemble those of the CD3+ cells. A large number of infiltrating cells, including several macrophage-like cells, expressed the Thy 1.2 antigen. Flow cytometry of infiltrating cells in the ICC xenograft revealed that approximately half of the cells expressing the F4/80 antigen also expressed Thy 1.2 and/or CD4. No cells were found expressing both the F4/80 and CD8 antigens. Both the F4/80 single-positive and the F4/80, CD4 double-positive cells were found to be larger and more granular than the CD4 single-positive cells. No co-expression of CD4 or Thy 1.2 with the F4/80 antigen was detected on cells infiltrating allogeneic tissue grafts. Moreover, a relative large number of cells (approximately 15%) in the xenograft expressed the NK 1.1 antigen as determined by flow cytometry. The role of natural killer (NK) cells in islet xenograft rejection was further evaluated in mice depleted of NK cells, using intraperitoneal injections of the monoclonal antibody NK 1.1. The simultaneous inoculation and subsequent growth of the NK cell-sensitive beta 2-microglobulin-deficient mutant, C4.4-25-, lymphoma cell line EL-4 served as an in vivo control of NK cell depletion. However, all NK cell-depleted mice rejected the ICC xenograft. In contrast, athymic mice permanently accepted the porcine ICC xenograft but, readily rejected the NK cell-sensitive lymphoma cell line. Taken together, ICC xenograft rejection in mice seems to be T cell dependent, as evidenced in the nude mice model, while the main effector cell appears to be a macrophage with a unique phenotype.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8629289     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199605150-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  15 in total

Review 1.  CD47 in xenograft rejection and tolerance induction.

Authors:  Yong-Guang Yang
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.907

Review 2.  T-cell-mediated immunological barriers to xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Joseph Scalea; Isabel Hanecamp; Simon C Robson; Kazuhiko Yamada
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.907

Review 3.  Immunological challenges and therapies in xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Marta Vadori; Emanuele Cozzi
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 6.915

4.  Local co-delivery of pancreatic islets and liposomal clodronate using injectable hydrogel to prevent acute immune reactions in a type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Muhammad R Haque; Dong Yun Lee; Cheol-Hee Ahn; Jee-Heon Jeong; Youngro Byun
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Decomplementation with cobra venom factor prolongs survival of xenografted islets in a rat to mouse model.

Authors:  J Oberholzer; D Yu; F Triponez; N Cretin; E Andereggen; G Mentha; D White; L Buehler; P Morel; J Lou
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 7.397

Review 6.  Tolerance in xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Yamada; Megan Sykes; David H Sachs
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.640

Review 7.  Pancreatic islet xenotransplantation: barriers and prospects.

Authors:  Gina R Rayat; Ronald G Gill
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 8.  Achieving tolerance in pig-to-primate xenotransplantation: reality or fantasy.

Authors:  David H Sachs; Megan Sykes; Kazuhiko Yamada
Journal:  Transpl Immunol       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 1.708

9.  Alpha-Galactosyl trisaccharide epitope: Modification of the 6-primary positions and recognition by human anti-alphaGal antibody.

Authors:  Peter R Andreana; Przemyslaw Kowal; Adam J Janczuk; Peng George Wang
Journal:  Glycoconj J       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.916

Review 10.  Xenotransplantation: immunological hurdles and progress toward tolerance.

Authors:  Adam Griesemer; Kazuhiko Yamada; Megan Sykes
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 12.988

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.