Literature DB >> 8628799

Cost and outcome of osteocutaneous free-tissue transfer versus pedicled soft-tissue reconstruction for composite mandibular defects.

A Talesnik1, B Markowitz, T Calcaterra, C Ahn, W Shaw.   

Abstract

Thirty-nine patients underwent reconstruction of composite mandibular defects following resection for squamous cell carcinoma. Thirty-four underwent immediate reconstruction, while 5 were reconstructed secondarily. Twenty-one received soft-tissue reconstruction only with a pectoralis major myocutaneous flap, 14 underwent osteocutaneous free-tissue transfer, and 4 received a reconstruction plate with free-tissue transfer for soft-tissue coverage. The mandibular defects in the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap group tended to be posterolateral, while free-tissue transfer defects were more severe, usually involving the anterior mandible. Length of surgery and duration of intensive care unit care were significantly longer for free-tissue transfer patients, while flap complications were more common in the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap patients. Facial appearance scores were higher for the free-tissue transfer group by both patient and physician assessment. Social function, speech, and oral function did not differ significantly. Patients reconstructed secondarily with free-tissue transfer reported significant improvement in appearance, oral continence, and social function, with little change in speech intelligibility, deglutition, or diet tolerance. The cost of the main hospitalization was significantly higher in the free-tissue transfer group than in the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap group, although when the costs of subsequent hospitalizations are included, the difference in total cost narrows. Despite more adverse defects, free-tissue transfer provided more predictable aesthetic results and expeditious return to normal social function than did pectoralis major myocutaneous flap reconstruction. The fiscal impact of these complex reconstructions is, however, significant. Cost-containment issues are presented and recommendations are made.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8628799     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199605000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  6 in total

1.  An assessment of the anatomical basis of the thoracoacromial artery perforator flap.

Authors:  Christopher Robert Geddes; Maolin Tang; Daping Yang; Steven F Morris
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2003

2.  Change in reimbursement and costs in German oncological head and neck surgery over the last decade: ablative tongue cancer surgery and reconstruction with split-thickness skin graft vs. microvascular radial forearm flap.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoefert; Oliver Lotter
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Contemporary role of pectoralis major regional flaps in head and neck surgery.

Authors:  F Bussu; R Gallus; V Navach; R Bruschini; M Tagliabue; G Almadori; G Paludetti; L Calabrese
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.124

4.  Functional outcome predictors following mandibular reconstruction with osteocutaneous fibula free flaps: correlating early postoperative videofluoroscopic swallow studies with long-term clinical results.

Authors:  Santiago R Gonzalez; Bradley Hobbs; Emre Vural; Mauricio A Moreno
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-08-02

5.  Reimbursement for reconstruction by tissue transfer-a European comparison.

Authors:  Oliver Lotter; William Arthur Townley; Philipp Gonser; Hans-Eberhard Schaller; Sebastian Hoefert
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Pectoralis major myocutaneous flap in head and neck reconstruction: An experience in 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Mayank Tripathi; Sanjeev Parshad; Rajender Kumar Karwasra; Virender Singh
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015 Jan-Jun
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.