Literature DB >> 8628608

Growth and physical outcome of children conceived by in vitro fertilization.

K Saunders1, J Spensley, J Munro, G Halasz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the growth and physical outcome at 2 years of age for children born after assisted reproductive techniques in the state of Victoria.
DESIGN: Using a case-matched control study between January 1991 and July 1993, 314 children (196 singletons, 47 sets of twins, 8 sets of triplets) conceived after in vitro fertilization (IVF) and related techniques at the Monash IVF and Royal Women's Hospital Reproductive Biology Unit and 150 control children (113 singletons, 17 sets of twins, 1 set of triplets) randomly selected from the general population using the Victorian Perinatal Data Collection Unit records were enrolled to be examined for minor dysmorphic and major organ abnormalities. Singleton and twin cases were matched for plurality and gestation and date of birth. Triplets were not matched.
RESULTS: IVF status was not a significant independent factor for physical outcomes, including malformation rates, nor for days of hospitalization postdischarge and operations. There was no significant interaction between IVF status and mean percentiles for weight and head circumference. The IVF group had a greater mean length percentile. Twins in both groups had significantly poorer physical outcomes than singletons on some measures.
CONCLUSION: This study did not demonstrate an independent IVF effect on the growth and physical outcome of children at 2 years of age when matched for plurality and gestation. The poor outcomes where noted were related to the effects of multiple births. These findings must be viewed in context of the response rates and therefore representativeness of the data. The need for longitudinal studies is demonstrated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8628608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  9 in total

1.  Health risks in babies born after assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Alastair G Sutcliffe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-07-20

2.  Epigenetics and assisted reproductive technology: a call for investigation.

Authors:  Emily L Niemitz; Andrew P Feinberg
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Follow-up issues with multiples.

Authors:  Aideen M Moore; Karel O'Brien
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.253

4.  Infertility treatment and children's longitudinal growth between birth and 3 years of age.

Authors:  E H Yeung; R Sundaram; E M Bell; C Druschel; C Kus; Y Xie; G M Buck Louis
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Application of a validated prediction model for in vitro fertilization: comparison of live birth rates and multiple birth rates with 1 embryo transferred over 2 cycles vs 2 embryos in 1 cycle.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Judy E Stern; Valerie L Baker; Eric Widra; Charles C Coddington; William E Gibbons; Bradley J Van Voorhis; G David Ball
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Perinatal and somatic growth properties of preterm babies born from spontaneous and in vitro fertilization multiple pregnancies.

Authors:  Mehmet Gökhan Ramoğlu; Sultan Kavuncuoğlu; Sibel Özbek; Esin Aldemir
Journal:  Turk Pediatri Ars       Date:  2014-03-01

Review 7.  Cardiometabolic health of children conceived by assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Edwina H Yeung; Charlotte Druschel
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Evaluation of the growth process of infants conceived by assisted reproductive techniques at royan institute from birth to 9 months.

Authors:  Ramin Mozafari Kermani; Shabnam Zoljalali; Jalil Kouhpayezadeh; Mohammad-Reza Nateghi; Abolhasan Shahzadehfazeli; Leila Nedaifard
Journal:  Iran J Pediatr       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 0.364

9.  Cognitive development following ART: effect of choice of comparison group, confounding and mediating factors.

Authors:  C Carson; J J Kurinczuk; A Sacker; Y Kelly; R Klemetti; M Redshaw; M A Quigley
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 6.918

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.