Literature DB >> 8627821

Preoperative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for prostate specific antigen predicts treatment failure following radical prostatectomy.

C A Olsson1, G M de Vries, A J Raffo, M C Benson, K O'Toole, Y Cao, R E Buttyan, A E Katz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We previously demonstrated than an enhanced reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay for prostate specific antigen (PSA) can predict final pathological stage in radical prostatectomy patients. The potential role of the assay in predicting serum PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy was explored.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 100 radical prostatectomy candidates by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction preoperatively, and status was compared to serum PSA, Gleason score and final pathological results. Potential surgical failure was defined as tumor at the surgical margin or extending into the seminal vesicle. Patients were monitored postoperatively by serum PSA every 4 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and disease recurrence, defined as a PSA of 0.2 ng/ml. or greater.
RESULTS: Enhanced reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for PSA had a stronger correlation with potential surgical failure than preoperative serum PSA or Gleason score (relative risks 15.2, 5.9 and 3.2, respectively). The correlation between these modalities and PSA recurrence was evaluated during a mean followup of 13.6 months (range 5 to 26). Of 36 patients with positive reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reactions 9 had failure by PSA compared to 3 of 64 (4.7%) with negative polymerase chain reactions (p<0.0286). The relative risk for failure by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction was 3.6. Gleason score and serum PSA had higher correlations with postoperative PSA elevations (relative risk 13.2 and 7.6, respectively). A Cox regression analysis model demonstrated that reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for PSA can be used in conjunction with Gleason score and provides statistically significant risk information.
CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for PSA is a statistically significant predictor of potential failure by pathological analysis and of disease recurrence by PSA. Longer followup data are required to define further the role of the assay in the management of patients with prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8627821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  9 in total

Review 1.  Isolated, disseminated and circulating tumour cells in prostate cancer.

Authors:  David Schilling; Tilman Todenhöfer; Jörg Hennenlotter; Christian Schwentner; Tanja Fehm; Arnulf Stenzl
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Prognostic role of circulating tumor cells and disseminated tumor cells in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xuelei Ma; Zhilan Xiao; Xiaojun Li; Fengtian Wang; Jing Zhang; Rubai Zhou; Junbo Wang; Lei Liu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-02-22

Review 3.  Regular review: tumour markers in malignancies.

Authors:  A Lindblom; A Liljegren
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-02-12

4.  Simultaneous quantification of human glandular kallikrein 2 and prostate-specific antigen mRNAs in peripheral blood from prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  A Ylikoski; M Karp; K Pettersson; H Lilja; T Lövgren
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  Quantification of PSA mRNA levels in peripheral blood of patients with localized prostate adenocarcinoma before, during, and after radical prostatectomy by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR).

Authors:  Nadir Kalfazade; Ahmet M Kuskucu; Serdar Karadag; Selcuk Sahin; Bekir Aras; Kenan Midilli; Gülden Yilmaz; Ali I Tasci
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 6.  Detection of circulating tumor cells in prostate cancer patients: methodological pitfalls and clinical relevance.

Authors:  Zacharoula Panteleakou; Peter Lembessis; Antigone Sourla; Nikolaos Pissimissis; Aristides Polyzos; Charalambos Deliveliotis; Michael Koutsilieris
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 6.354

Review 7.  Cancer micrometastases.

Authors:  Klaus Pantel; Catherine Alix-Panabières; Sabine Riethdorf
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 8.  Prostate cancer, Incidence, management and outcomes.

Authors:  E J Small
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 9.  Circulating biomarkers for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Thomas Steuber; Pauliina Helo; Hans Lilja
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 4.226

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.