Literature DB >> 8627632

Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near native folds from well-constructed decoys.

B Park1, M Levitt.   

Abstract

This study generates ensembles of decoy or test structures for eight small proteins with a variety of different folds. Between 35,000 and 200,000 decoys were generated for each protein using our four-state off-lattice model together with a novel relaxation method. These give compact self-avoiding conformations each constrained to have native secondary structure. Ensembles of these decoy conformations were used to test the ability of several types of empirical contact, surface area and distance-dependent energy functions to distinguish between correct and incorrect conformations. These tests have shown that none of the functions is able to distinguish consistently either the X-ray conformation or the near-native conformations from others which are incorrect. Certain combinations of two of these energy functions were able, however, consistently to identify X-ray structures from amongst the decoy conformations. These same combinations are better also at identifying near-native conformations, consistently finding them with a hundred-fold higher frequency than chance. The fact that these combination energy functions perform better than generally accepted energy functions suggests their future use in folding simulations and perhaps threading predictions.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8627632     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  123 in total

1.  Free energy determinants of tertiary structure and the evaluation of protein models.

Authors:  D Petrey; B Honig
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  A self-consistent knowledge-based approach to protein design.

Authors:  A Rossi; C Micheletti; F Seno; A Maritan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Scoring functions in protein folding and design.

Authors:  R I Dima; J R Banavar; A Maritan
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Selecting near-native conformations in homology modeling: the role of molecular mechanics and solvation terms.

Authors:  A Janardhan; S Vajda
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Decoys 'R' Us: a database of incorrect conformations to improve protein structure prediction.

Authors:  R Samudrala; M Levitt
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Free energies of protein decoys provide insight into determinants of protein stability.

Authors:  Y N Vorobjev; J Hermans
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Improved recognition of native-like protein structures using a family of designed sequences.

Authors:  Patrice Koehl; Michael Levitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-08       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Statistical potentials for fold assessment.

Authors:  Francisco Melo; Roberto Sánchez; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  TOUCHSTONE: an ab initio protein structure prediction method that uses threading-based tertiary restraints.

Authors:  D Kihara; H Lu; A Kolinski; J Skolnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-08-14       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A physical approach to protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Silvia Crivelli; Elizabeth Eskow; Brett Bader; Vincent Lamberti; Richard Byrd; Robert Schnabel; Teresa Head-Gordon
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.