Literature DB >> 8627345

Production and characterization of two ependymoma xenografts.

R E McLendon1, K M Fung, R C Bentley, B K Ahmed Rasheed, J Q Trojanowski, S H Bigner, D D Bigner, H S Friedman.   

Abstract

Childhood ependymomas exhibit epidemiologic, anatomic, histologic, and biologic features and distinguish them from other gliomas. Because of their propensity to grow in functionally sensitive regions of the brain, adequate tumor sampling for basic and therapeutic research is limited. We have established xenografts in both subcutaneous and intracranial nude mouse systems (D528 EP-X, D612 EP-X) from the ependymomas of two nonrelated children. Median subcutaneous growth rates (reported in days to grow from 200 mm3 to 1000 mm3) are 82 days for D528 EP-X (n = 10) and 50 days for D612 EP-X (n = 10). D528 EP-X grows intracranially with a median postimplantation survival of 85 days (n = 10); D612 EP produces a median postimplantation survival of 72.5 days (n = 10). Both xenografts grow as well-formed masses with no evidence of infiltration into either brain or subcutaneous tissues. While perivascular pseudopalisading is found in both xenografts, true ependymal rosette formation is absent. Ultrastructurally, neither xenograft exhibits cilia, but both produce abundant intermediate filaments. By light microscopy, the neoplastic cells are immunoreactive for the intermediate filaments glial fibrillary acidic protein, vimentin, and nestin. Karyotypically D528 EP exhibits 46,XX,del(6)(q22q26)/46,XX while D612 EP exhibits 50,XX, +X,t(1;8)(p11;q11),t(1;8)(p11;q11), +1,-4, der(5)t(4;5)(q12;q35), +der(5)t(4;5)(q12;q35),-6, +9, +9,-16, +der(17)t(6;17)(p11;p11), +mar. Restriction fragment length polymorphism studies comparing the primary brain tumor tissue from each patient against multiple passages of the resulting xenografts confirm the origin of both xenografts. These xenografts represent models on which future studies into the oncogenesis, progression and therapy of ependymomas can be performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8627345     DOI: 10.1097/00005072-199605000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol        ISSN: 0022-3069            Impact factor:   3.685


  6 in total

1.  Characterization of 2 Novel Ependymoma Cell Lines With Chromosome 1q Gain Derived From Posterior Fossa Tumors of Childhood.

Authors:  Vladimir Amani; Andrew M Donson; Seth C Lummus; Eric W Prince; Andrea M Griesinger; Davis A Witt; Todd C Hankinson; Michael H Handler; Kathleen Dorris; Rajeev Vibhakar; Nicholas K Foreman; Lindsey M Hoffman
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.685

Review 2.  The genetic and epigenetic basis of ependymoma.

Authors:  Stephen C Mack; Michael D Taylor
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 3.  Childhood ependymoma: a systematic review of treatment options and strategies.

Authors:  Jacques Grill; Chastagner Pascal; Kalifa Chantal
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.022

4.  A clinically relevant orthotopic xenograft model of ependymoma that maintains the genomic signature of the primary tumor and preserves cancer stem cells in vivo.

Authors:  Litian Yu; Patricia A Baxter; Horatiu Voicu; Sivashankarappa Gurusiddappa; Yijue Zhao; Adekunle Adesina; Tsz-Kwong Man; Qin Shu; Yu-Jing Zhang; Xiu-Mei Zhao; Jack M Su; Lazlo Perlaky; Robert Dauser; Murali Chintagumpala; Ching C Lau; Susan M Blaney; Pulivarthi H Rao; Hon-Chiu Eastwood Leung; Xiao-Nan Li
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  Locoregional delivery of CAR T cells to the cerebrospinal fluid for treatment of metastatic medulloblastoma and ependymoma.

Authors:  Laura K Donovan; Alberto Delaidelli; Sujith K Joseph; Kevin Bielamowicz; Kristen Fousek; Borja L Holgado; Alex Manno; Dilakshan Srikanthan; Ahmed Z Gad; Randy Van Ommeren; David Przelicki; Cory Richman; Vijay Ramaswamy; Craig Daniels; Jonelle G Pallota; Tajana Douglas; Alyssa C M Joynt; Joonas Haapasalo; Carolina Nor; Maria C Vladoiu; Claudia M Kuzan-Fischer; Livia Garzia; Stephen C Mack; Srinidhi Varadharajan; Matthew L Baker; Liam Hendrikse; Michelle Ly; Kaitlin Kharas; Polina Balin; Xiaochong Wu; Lei Qin; Ning Huang; Ana Guerreiro Stucklin; A Sorana Morrissy; Florence M G Cavalli; Betty Luu; Raul Suarez; Pasqualino De Antonellis; Antony Michealraj; Avesta Rastan; Meenakshi Hegde; Martin Komosa; Olga Sirbu; Sachin A Kumar; Zied Abdullaev; Claudia C Faria; Stephen Yip; Juliette Hukin; Uri Tabori; Cynthia Hawkins; Ken Aldape; Mads Daugaard; John M Maris; Poul H Sorensen; Nabil Ahmed; Michael D Taylor
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 6.  Patient-Derived Orthotopic Xenograft Models of Pediatric Brain Tumors: In a Mature Phase or Still in Its Infancy?

Authors:  Eva Hermans; Esther Hulleman
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 6.244

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.