Literature DB >> 8626516

Receptor recognition and specificity of interleukin-8 is determined by residues that cluster near a surface-accessible hydrophobic pocket.

M E Hammond1, V Shyamala, M A Siani, C A Gallegos, P H Feucht, J Abbott, G R Lapointe, M Moghadam, H Khoja, J Zakel, P Tekamp-Olson.   

Abstract

To determine the regions of interleukin-8 (IL-8) that allow high affinity and interleukin-8 receptor type 1 (IL8R1)-specific binding of chemokines, we produced chimeric proteins containing structural domains from IL-8, which binds to both IL8R1 and interleukin-8 receptor type 2 (IL8R2) with high affinity, and from GRO gamma, which does not bind to IL8R1 and binds to IL8R2 with reduced affinity. Receptor binding activity was tested by competition of 125I-IL-8 binding to recombinant IL8R1 and IL8R2 cell lines. Substitution into IL-8 of the GRO gamma sequences corresponding to either the amino-terminal loop (amino acids 1-18) or the first beta-sheet (amino acids 18-32) reduced binding to both IL8R1 and IL8R2. The third beta-sheet of IL-8 (amino acids 46-53) was required for binding to IL8R1 but not IL8R2. Exchanges of the second beta-sheet (amino acids 32-46) or the carboxyl-terminal alpha-helix (amino acids 53-72) had no significant effect. When IL-8 sequences were substituted into GRO gamma, a single domain containing the second beta-sheet of IL-8 (amino acids 18-32) was sufficient to confer high affinity binding for both IL8R1 and IL8R2. The amino-terminal loop (amino acids 1-18) and the third beta-sheet (amino acids 46-53) of IL-8 had little effect when substituted individually but showed increased binding to both receptors when substituted in combination. Individual amino acid substitutions were made at positions where IL-8 and GRO gamma sequences differ within the regions of residues 11-21 and 46-53. IL-8 mutations L49A or L49F selectively inhibited binding to IL8R1. Mutations Y13L and F21N enhanced binding to IL8R1 with little effect on IL8R2. A combined mutation Y13L/S14Q selectively decreased binding to IL8R2. Residues Tyr13, Ser14, Phe21, and Lys49 are clustered in and around a surface-accessible hydrophobic pocket on IL-8 that is physically distant from the previously identified ELR binding sequence. A homology model of GRO gamma, constructed from the known structure of IL-8 by refinement calculations, indicated that access to the hydrophobic pocket was effectively abolished in GRO gamma. These studies suggest that the surface hydrophobic pocket and/or adjacent residues participate in IL-8 receptor recognition for both IL8R1 and IL8R2 and that the hydrophobic pocket itself may be essential for IL8R1 binding. Thus this region contains a second site for IL-8 receptor recognition that, in combination with the Glu4-Leu5-Arg6 region, can modulate receptor binding affinity and IL8R1 specificity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8626516     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.271.14.8228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  15 in total

1.  Characterization of Nef-CXCR4 interactions important for apoptosis induction.

Authors:  Ming-Bo Huang; Ling Ling Jin; Cleve O James; Mahfuz Khan; Michael D Powell; Vincent C Bond
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 2.  Structural basis of chemokine receptor function--a model for binding affinity and ligand selectivity.

Authors:  Lavanya Rajagopalan; Krishna Rajarathnam
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Structure of monomeric Interleukin-8 and its interactions with the N-terminal Binding Site-I of CXCR1 by solution NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Sabrina Berkamp; Sang Ho Park; Anna A De Angelis; Francesca M Marassi; Stanley J Opella
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 4.  How do chemokines navigate neutrophils to the target site: Dissecting the structural mechanisms and signaling pathways.

Authors:  Krishna Rajarathnam; Michael Schnoor; Ricardo M Richardson; Sudarshan Rajagopal
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.315

5.  A CXCL8 receptor antagonist based on the structure of N-acetyl-proline-glycine-proline.

Authors:  Patricia L Jackson; Brett D Noerager; Michael J Jablonsky; Matthew T Hardison; Bryan D Cox; James C Patterson; Boopathy Dhanapal; J Edwin Blalock; Donald D Muccio
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 4.432

6.  Molecular requirements for sorting of the chemokine interleukin-8/CXCL8 to endothelial Weibel-Palade bodies.

Authors:  Johanna Hol; Axel M Küchler; Finn-Eirik Johansen; Bjørn Dalhus; Guttorm Haraldsen; Inger Oynebråten
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Crystal structure of chemically synthesized [N33A] stromal cell-derived factor 1alpha, a potent ligand for the HIV-1 "fusin" coreceptor.

Authors:  C Dealwis; E J Fernandez; D A Thompson; R J Simon; M A Siani; E Lolis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-06-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Cell surface heparan sulfate participates in CXCL1-induced signaling.

Authors:  Dingzhi Wang; Jiqing Sai; Ann Richmond
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2003-02-04       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Structural basis for differential binding of the interleukin-8 monomer and dimer to the CXCR1 N-domain: role of coupled interactions and dynamics.

Authors:  Aishwarya Ravindran; Prem Raj B Joseph; Krishna Rajarathnam
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Identification of GRO1 as a critical determinant for mutant p53 gain of function.

Authors:  Wensheng Yan; Xinbin Chen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.