Literature DB >> 8626141

p53 as a prognostic indicator in endometrial cancer.

J P Geisler1, M C Wiemann, Z Zhou, G A Miller, H E Geisler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the most common genetic alterations to occur in human cancers is an alteration of the p53 tumor suppressor gene. Although endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States, any connection between it and p53 is just beginning to be explored.
METHODS: Forty-six consecutively surgically treated patients with endometrial cancer had their p53 expression studied by immunoperoxidase staining and quantified by image analysis.
RESULTS: Thirty-five patients had endometrioid adenocarcinomas, 3 had adenosquamous carcinomas, 3 had papillary serous carcinomas, 3 had clear cell carcinomas, and 2 had undifferentiated carcinomas. p53 expression ranged from 0.0 to 55.8% with a mean of 10.7% for the cohort. For the patients with endometrioid carcinomas, the mean p53 expression was 3.9%, while for those with more aggressive histologies it was 32.4% (P < 0.001). Sixteen of the 35 endometrioid tumors (45.7%) stained positive for p53, while 11 of the remaining 12 (91.2%) tumors with more aggressive histologies stained positive (P < 0.01). Increasing histologic grade correlated with an increasing p53 expression (P = 0.006). The percentage of patient tumors expressing p53 was found to be higher in FIGO stage II, III, and IV than in FIGO stage I cancer (P = 0.01). However, the mean p53 expression was not different between early (stage 1) and advanced (stage 11, III, and IV) cancers (P = 0.55). Utilizing recurrence as the endpoint for multivariate analysis, FIGO stage and p53 expression were the only independent prognostic indicators found.
CONCLUSION: p53 expression is more common in more aggressive histologic subtypes than in endometrioid adenocarcinomas. It is an independent prognostic indicator of disease recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8626141     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1996.0133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  6 in total

1.  Characterization of LHY-821, a novel moderately differentiated endometrial carcinoma cell line.

Authors:  Qian Hu; Li Yu; Rui Chen; Yan Zhang; Ya Xie; Qinping Liao
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 2.416

2.  Selected immuno-histochemical markers in curettage specimens and their correlation with final pathologic findings in endometrial cancer patients.

Authors:  Basil R Obeidat; Ismail I Matalka; Alia A Mohtaseb; Nabih S Al-Kaisi
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  Laminin-5 gamma2-chain expression and DNA ploidy as predictors of prognosis in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  C Lundgren; B Frankendal; C Silfverswärd; B Nilsson; K Tryggvason; G Auer; B Nordström
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  P53 and BCL-2 as prognostic markers in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Márcia L M Appel; Maria I Edelweiss; James Fleck; Luis F Rivero; Waldemar A Rivoire; Heleusa I Mônego; Ricardo Dos Reis
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 3.201

5.  Independent prognostic importance of microvessel density in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  H B Salvesen; O E Iversen; L A Akslen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  KDM4B and KDM4A promote endometrial cancer progression by regulating androgen receptor, c-myc, and p27kip1.

Authors:  Mei-Ting Qiu; Qiong Fan; Zhu Zhu; Suet-Ying Kwan; Limo Chen; Jin-Hong Chen; Zuo-Lin Ying; Ye Zhou; Wei Gu; Li-Hua Wang; Wei-Wei Cheng; Jianfang Zeng; Xiao-Ping Wan; Samuel C Mok; Kwong-Kwok Wong; Wei Bao
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-10-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.