Literature DB >> 8625203

Multimodal treatment with neoadjuvant intraarterial chemotherapy and radical surgery in patients with stage IIIB-IVA cervical cancer. A preliminary study.

C Scarabelli1, A Zarrelli, A Gallo, M C Visentin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the role of neoadjuvant intraarterial chemotherapy (NIC) in patients with advanced cervical cancer.
METHODS: From June 1989 to December 1993, 36 consecutive patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage IIIB-IVA cervical cancer were admitted to the study. Treatment consisted of a bilateral infusion in the internal iliac artery of bleomycin (2.5 mg), doxorubicin (10 mg), and cisplatin (20 mg) for five courses after a 4-day rest period.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine (80.5%) patients received 100% of the programmed chemotherapeutic dose. The major toxic effects, according to World Health Organization criteria, were hematologic (19.4%, Grade 3 or 4), renal (2.8%, Grade 2), and gastrointestinal (61.1%, Grade 1 or 2). Only four patients (11.1%) had scanty bleeding around the site of catheter insertion. Neoadjuvant intraarterial chemotherapy induced responses in 33 of the 36 patients (5 complete, 28 partial; overall response rate, 91.7%), thus permitting radical surgery in all of these cases. Pretreatment characteristics were analyzed for response to NIC. None of the clinical parameters studied were related to chemoresponsiveness. A lower than expected incidence of lymph node metastases was detected (33.3%). Ten (30.3%) of the 33 patients who underwent surgery had disease recurrence. Lymph node status and pathologic parametrial involvement were significant prognostic factors for recurrence. The 5-year estimated survival for patients with a complete response, partial response, and stable disease was 100%, 36.2%, and 0%, respectively (P < 0.001). Clinical stage (P = 0.003) and response to NIC (P < 0.001) were significant prognostic factors in the overall estimated survival. The 5-year actuarial survival for patients with Stage IIIB and IVA disease was 66.7% and 0%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that NIC should be considered as a means of achieving prompt local control before surgery and/or radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8625203     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950915)76:6<1019::aid-cncr2820760616>3.0.co;2-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  9 in total

Review 1.  The role of radical hysterectomy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in carcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  David H Moore
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Neoadjuvant intraarterial chemotherapy for stage IIB-IIIB cervical cancer in Japanese women.

Authors:  Shoji Kaku; Kentaro Takahashi; Yoshitaka Murakami; Shirou Wakinoue; Tetsuya Nakagawa; Yoshihiko Shimizu; Nobuyuki Kita; Yoichi Noda; Takashi Murakami
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Long-term follow-up of neoadjuvant intraarterial chemotherapy using an original four-lumen double-balloon (4L-DB) catheter for locally advanced uterine cervical cancer.

Authors:  Yoshito Terai; Masanori Kanemura; Hiroshi Sasaki; Satoshi Tsunetoh; Yoshimichi Tanaka; Yoshiki Yamashita; Kazuhiro Yamamoto; Isamu Narabayashi; Masahide Ohmichi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Comparative study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical hysterectomy and radical surgery alone in stage IB2-IIA bulky cervical cancer.

Authors:  Yun-Hyun Cho; Dae-Yeon Kim; Jong-Hyeok Kim; Yong-Man Kim; Young-Tak Kim; Joo-Hyun Nam
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 4.401

5.  Explanation for the failure of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to improve outcomes after radiotherapy for locally advanced uterine cervical cancer from the standpoint of the tumor regression rate.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Ohara; Hajime Tsunoda; Yumiko Oishi Tanaka; Kayoko Ohnishi; Keiko Nemoto; Takayuki Hashimoto; Nobuyoshi Fukumitsu; Masaharu Hata; Shinji Sugahara; Koichi Tokuuye; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa; Yasuyuki Akine
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-02-27

6.  Combination therapy with irinotecan and cisplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  T Sugiyama; T Nishida; S Kumagai; S Nishio; K Fujiyoshi; N Okura; M Yakushiji; M Hiura; N Umesaki
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Comparison of Neoadjuvant Intraarterial Chemotherapy Versus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Stage IIIB Uterine Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Ryuji Kawaguchi; Haruki Nakamura; Sachiko Morioka; Huminori Ito; Yasuhito Tanase; Shoji Haruta; Seiji Kanayama; Shozo Yosida; Naoto Furukawa; Hidekazu Oi; Hiroshi Kobayashi
Journal:  World J Oncol       Date:  2014-01-16

8.  The Surgical Morbidity And Oncological Outcome Of Total Laparoscopic Radical Trachelectomy Versus Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy For Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Study With 11-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Qi Lu; Zhiqiang Zhang; Meizhu Xiao; Chongdong Liu; Zhenyu Zhang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 9.  The Safety and Efficacy of Intra-Arterial versus Intravenous Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Cheng Liu; Ran Cui; Miaomiao Li; Ying Feng; Huimin Bai; Zhenyu Zhang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 2.629

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.