BACKGROUND: Treatment with interleukin-2 (IL-2) and lymphokine-activated killer cells (LAK) resulted in responses in some patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the relative therapeutic benefit of the addition of LAK to IL-2 was unknown. METHODS: A randomized Phase III trial was conducted in patients with RCC comparingcontinuous intravenous infusion (CI) IL-2 alone with CI IL-2 plus LAK. Interleukin-2 was administered at 3 x 10(6) U/m2/day on days 1-5, 13-17, 21-24, and 28-31. Patients on the LAK treatment arm underwent leukapheresis on days 8-10 and LAK cell reinfusion on days 13-15. The results are reported with long-term follow-up. The published experience with IL-2 alone or with the addition of LAK was investigated in a quantitative literature survey. The response proportions were studied by schedule (high dose bolus, moderate dose, low dose) and by concomitant administration of LAK. RESULTS:Seventy-one patients were treated, 36 on the IL-2 arm and 35 on the IL-2 plus LAK arm. Four patients (6%) had major responses (two complete, two partial). The median survival of all patients was 13 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9-18 months). There were no differences between treatment arms with regard to response (P = 0.61) and survival (P = 0.67). More patients on the LAK arm experienced pulmonary toxicity (P = 0.008). The overall weighted response proportion was 16% (95% CI, 8%-24%) for the 39 published series of 1291 patients treated withIL-2. The 95% confidence intervals for response proportion overlapped when compared by schedule and by administration of LAK. CONCLUSIONS: The dose and schedule of IL-2 used in this study resulted in a low level of antitumor activity and the addition of LAK did not improve the response rate against RCC. Given the infrequent, but reproducible, responses with IL-2 and interferon-based regimens, continued investigation of these agents is warranted as is the study of new cytokines. Alternative treatment strategies should be studied in RCC and new agents and treatment regimens that appear promising in Phase II studies must be studied in randomized trials.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Treatment with interleukin-2 (IL-2) and lymphokine-activated killer cells (LAK) resulted in responses in some patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the relative therapeutic benefit of the addition of LAK to IL-2 was unknown. METHODS: A randomized Phase III trial was conducted in patients with RCC comparing continuous intravenous infusion (CI) IL-2 alone with CI IL-2 plus LAK. Interleukin-2 was administered at 3 x 10(6) U/m2/day on days 1-5, 13-17, 21-24, and 28-31. Patients on the LAK treatment arm underwent leukapheresis on days 8-10 and LAK cell reinfusion on days 13-15. The results are reported with long-term follow-up. The published experience with IL-2 alone or with the addition of LAK was investigated in a quantitative literature survey. The response proportions were studied by schedule (high dose bolus, moderate dose, low dose) and by concomitant administration of LAK. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were treated, 36 on the IL-2 arm and 35 on the IL-2 plus LAK arm. Four patients (6%) had major responses (two complete, two partial). The median survival of all patients was 13 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9-18 months). There were no differences between treatment arms with regard to response (P = 0.61) and survival (P = 0.67). More patients on the LAK arm experienced pulmonary toxicity (P = 0.008). The overall weighted response proportion was 16% (95% CI, 8%-24%) for the 39 published series of 1291 patients treated with IL-2. The 95% confidence intervals for response proportion overlapped when compared by schedule and by administration of LAK. CONCLUSIONS: The dose and schedule of IL-2 used in this study resulted in a low level of antitumor activity and the addition of LAK did not improve the response rate against RCC. Given the infrequent, but reproducible, responses with IL-2 and interferon-based regimens, continued investigation of these agents is warranted as is the study of new cytokines. Alternative treatment strategies should be studied in RCC and new agents and treatment regimens that appear promising in Phase II studies must be studied in randomized trials.
Authors: Katherine A Murphy; Britnie R James; Yue Guan; Donald S Torry; Andrew Wilber; Thomas S Griffith Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother Date: 2015 Impact factor: 3.452