BACKGROUND: The possibility of tumor sanctuary sites in the central nervous system (CNS) of patients receiving paclitaxel has been suggested by laboratory data identifying low concentrations of drug in the brain and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of rats. METHODS: The pattern of disease progression in patients with metastatic breast cancer who had an initial response to paclitaxel treatment in five Phase II trials at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center was reviewed. RESULTS: Of 152 patients, 53 had a partial or complete response, and 25 had a minor response. Of the 78 patients who responded to paclitaxel, 52 had subsequent disease progression, 22 changed treatments before progression occurred (as specified by the protocol and/or to receive high dose consolidation chemotherapy), 2 stopped receiving treatment because of toxicity, 1 continued receiving treatment, and 1 died with no evidence of disease progression. Six of the 52 patients who progressed after initially responding to paclitaxel had isolated CNS progression while maintaining their systemic response (leptomeningeal metastasis in three, brain metastases in two, brain and leptomeningeal metastases in one). One patient had CNS progression (brain metastases) associated with other systemic sites of progression. All patients with CNS disease developed neurologic symptoms, prompting neurologic evaluation; one had only a mild headache, which was not recognized until evaluation for paclitaxel-related peripheral neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the CNS, and particularly the CSF, is an important sanctuary site for patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving paclitaxel.
BACKGROUND: The possibility of tumor sanctuary sites in the central nervous system (CNS) of patients receiving paclitaxel has been suggested by laboratory data identifying low concentrations of drug in the brain and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of rats. METHODS: The pattern of disease progression in patients with metastatic breast cancer who had an initial response to paclitaxel treatment in five Phase II trials at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center was reviewed. RESULTS: Of 152 patients, 53 had a partial or complete response, and 25 had a minor response. Of the 78 patients who responded to paclitaxel, 52 had subsequent disease progression, 22 changed treatments before progression occurred (as specified by the protocol and/or to receive high dose consolidation chemotherapy), 2 stopped receiving treatment because of toxicity, 1 continued receiving treatment, and 1 died with no evidence of disease progression. Six of the 52 patients who progressed after initially responding to paclitaxel had isolated CNS progression while maintaining their systemic response (leptomeningeal metastasis in three, brain metastases in two, brain and leptomeningeal metastases in one). One patient had CNS progression (brain metastases) associated with other systemic sites of progression. All patients with CNS disease developed neurologic symptoms, prompting neurologic evaluation; one had only a mild headache, which was not recognized until evaluation for paclitaxel-related peripheral neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the CNS, and particularly the CSF, is an important sanctuary site for patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving paclitaxel.
Authors: Yongzhen Qian; Emily Hua; Kheem Bisht; Stephan Woditschka; Konstantine W Skordos; David J Liewehr; Seth M Steinberg; Edi Brogi; Muzaffar M Akram; J Keith Killian; Daniel C Edelman; Marbin Pineda; Stephanie Scurci; Yan Y Degenhardt; Sylvie Laquerre; Thomas A Lampkin; Paul S Meltzer; Kevin Camphausen; Patricia S Steeg; Diane Palmieri Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis Date: 2011-09-21 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: Kurt A Jaeckle; Tracy Batchelor; Steven J O'Day; Surasak Phuphanich; Pamela New; Glenn Lesser; Allen Cohn; Mark Gilbert; Robert Aiken; Deborah Heros; Lisa Rogers; Eric Wong; Dorcas Fulton; John C Gutheil; Said Baidas; Julia M Kennedy; Warren Mason; Paul Moots; Christy Russell; Lode J Swinnen; Stephen B Howell Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: B C Pestalozzi; P Francis; E Quinaux; S Dolci; E Azambuja; R D Gelber; G Viale; A Balil; M Andersson; B Nordenskjöld; M Gnant; J Gutierrez; I Láng; J P A Crown; M Piccart-Gebhart Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2008-06-18 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Sung Jin Kang; Kwang Soo Kim; Yoon Suk Ha; So Young Huh; Ji Hyun Lee; Jong Kuk Kim; Min Jeong Kim Journal: J Clin Neurol Date: 2010-03-26 Impact factor: 3.077