Literature DB >> 8625079

Cervical cancer survival in a high risk urban population.

W W Thoms1, E R Unger, P R Johnson, C O Spann, S H Hunter, R Smith, I R Horowitz, J P Icenogle, S D Vernon, W C Reeves.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer remains an important public health problem, particularly for the urban minority population. To the authors' knowledge, determinants of cervical cancer survival have not been studied in this high risk population.
METHODS: This study included all 158 women diagnosed and treated for invasive cervical cancer from January 1, 1986, through December 31, 1992, at the Grady Memorial Hospital and Clinics (Atlanta, GA). Medical records were abstracted to determine age at diagnosis, race, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) clinical stage, treatment, and survival. Pathologic material was reviewed to confirm the diagnosis.
RESULTS: Most patients (80%) were African American, and the stage distribution was similar for African American and white patients. Sixty-six (42%) had FIGO Stage I disease; 50%, Stage II or III; and 8%, Stage IV. Four-year actuarial survival differed significantly according to clinical stage (Ia = 94%, Ib = 79%, II = 39%, III = 26%, IV = 0%). Overall survival was lower for patients with glandular carcinomas than for those with squamous cell carcinomas (26% vs. 55%, P = 0.09). This difference was almost entirely due to increased mortality in patients with Stage Ib adenocarcinomas (53% vs. 88% for squamous cell carcinoma, Stage Ib, P = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: The major prognostic markers for cervical cancer survival in this high risk patient population were clinical stage and histology, factors identical to those identified for other populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8625079     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19951215)76:12<2518::aid-cncr2820761217>3.0.co;2-#

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  5 in total

1.  Topics for our times: affirmative action and women's health.

Authors:  W Chavkin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in mortality among women diagnosed with cervical cancer in New York City, 1995-2006.

Authors:  Anne Marie McCarthy; Tamara Dumanovsky; Kala Visvanathan; Amy R Kahn; Maria J Schymura
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  The impact of cervical cancer and dysplasia: a qualitative, multiethnic study.

Authors:  Kimlin T Ashing-Giwa; Marjorie Kagawa-Singer; Geraldine V Padilla; Judith S Tejero; Evana Hsiao; Rajinder Chhabra; Lucrecia Martinez; M Belinda Tucker
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Racial differences in cervical cancer survival in the Detroit metropolitan area.

Authors:  Sujana Movva; Anne-Michelle Noone; Mousumi Banerjee; Divya A Patel; Kendra Schwartz; Cecilia L Yee; Michael S Simon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Performance of papanicolaou testing and detection of cervical carcinoma in situ in participants of organized cervical cancer screening in South Korea.

Authors:  Mi Ah Han; Kui Son Choi; Hoo-Yeon Lee; Jae Kwan Jun; Kyu Won Jung; Sokbom Kang; Eun-Cheol Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.