Literature DB >> 8624681

Non-spatial attention disorders in patients with frontal or posterior brain damage.

O Godefroy1, C Lhullier, M Rousseaux.   

Abstract

The few studies that have looked at attention in patients with brain damage suggest a prominent role for the frontal lobe in nonspatial attentional control. However, the studies usually focus on one variety of attention and do not address the nature of the alteration of attention. In addition, the behavioural consequences of nonspatial attentional deficit remain unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of focal brain damage on divided and focused attention and the relationship between attention disorders and behavioural changes. The study group consisted of patients with lesions of the prefrontal and posterior cortices and control subjects. The assessment of attention used reaction time tests that evaluated the ability to divide attention between two sources (detection tests) and to focus attention on one source (Go/No-Go Tests). The response retardation of the 'frontal' group became more pronounced as the number of sources to be monitored increased, suggesting the presence of a deficit of divided attention. Focused attention deficit was demonstrated in the 'frontal' group by the more frequent responses to irrelevant stimuli on Go/No-Go Tests. Both focused and divided attention deficits were prominent when the lesion included the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the caudate nucleus. Selective deficit of divided or focused attention was shown in a few patients. Finally, the clinically assessed distractibility was related to disorders of divided and focused attention. This study provides additional evidence for the prominent role of the frontal lobe in nonspatial attention regulation and shows that it also operates in elementary perceptuomotor processes. The relationship between distractibility and attention indexes supports the idea that attention disorders may have a functional counterpart that is clinically assessable. The demonstration of selective deficit of divided or focused attention suggests that nonspatial attention depends upon different mechanisms and that it is not an undifferentiated general purpose mechanism. Further studies addressing the nature of the interactions between attentional mechanisms and other cognitive processes are required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8624681     DOI: 10.1093/brain/119.1.191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  15 in total

1.  Human prefrontal and sensory cortical activity during divided attention tasks.

Authors:  Rainer Loose; Christian Kaufmann; Dorothee P Auer; Klaus W Lange
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Hemisphere specialization as an aid in early infancy.

Authors:  Gordon Burnand
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.444

3.  Dopamine D4 receptors modulate brain metabolic activity in the prefrontal cortex and cerebellum at rest and in response to methylphenidate.

Authors:  Michael Michaelides; Javier Pascau; Juan-Domingo Gispert; Foteini Delis; David K Grandy; Gene-Jack Wang; Manuel Desco; Marcelo Rubinstein; Nora D Volkow; Panayotis K Thanos
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Linear age-correlated functional development of right inferior fronto-striato-cerebellar networks during response inhibition and anterior cingulate during error-related processes.

Authors:  Katya Rubia; Anna B Smith; Eric Taylor; Michael Brammer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Validation of an integrated method for determining cognitive ability: Implications for routine assessments and clinical trials.

Authors:  Olivier Godefroy; Laura Gibbons; Momar Diouf; David Nyenhuis; Martine Roussel; Sandra Black; Jean Marc Bugnicourt
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  Cognitive dysfunction in body dysmorphic disorder: new implications for nosological systems and neurobiological models.

Authors:  Kiri Jefferies-Sewell; Samuel R Chamberlain; Naomi A Fineberg; Keith R Laws
Journal:  CNS Spectr       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.790

7.  Dissociation between verbal response initiation and suppression after prefrontal lesions.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Volle; Angela de Lacy Costello; Laure M Coates; Catrin McGuire; Karren Towgood; Sam Gilbert; Serge Kinkingnehun; Jane E McNeil; Richard Greenwood; Ben Papps; Martin van den Broeck; Paul W Burgess
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Selective effects of methylphenidate in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a functional magnetic resonance study.

Authors:  C J Vaidya; G Austin; G Kirkorian; H W Ridlehuber; J E Desmond; G H Glover; J D Gabrieli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Integrating evidence from neuroimaging and neuropsychological studies of obsessive-compulsive disorder: the orbitofronto-striatal model revisited.

Authors:  Lara Menzies; Samuel R Chamberlain; Angela R Laird; Sarah M Thelen; Barbara J Sahakian; Ed T Bullmore
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  Training Self-Control: A Domain-General Translational Neuroscience Approach.

Authors:  Elliot T Berkman; Alice M Graham; Philip A Fisher
Journal:  Child Dev Perspect       Date:  2012-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.