OBJECTIVE: To investigate the long term outcome of patients with vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. DESIGN: A retrospective study using information obtained from patient casenotes. SAMPLE: One hundred and thirty-three women with a primary diagnosis of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN), identified during a 15-year period. RESULTS: The diagnosis of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia increased throughout the study period. Human papilloma virus changes were noted in 104 patients (78%); these women were significantly younger than those without (P < or = 0.001). Nineteen (14%) were managed by observation or medical treatment and the remainder by surgical methods. Histological or symptomatic recurrence after surgical treatment occurred in 55 (48%). When disease recurred, it usually did so within four years of treatment. Recurrence was more common following laser vapourisation than after local excision (75% vs 40%; P < or = 0.01). Progression to invasive disease occurred in nine patients (7%), none of whom were in the group being observed. Four deaths occurred in this group, three from gynaecological malignancies of the lower genital tract. CONCLUSION: Patients with vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia require long term follow up, and the risk of invasion may be higher than previously thought. Surgical treatment when required should be by excisional rather than ablative methods in most instances. In selected cases it is also possible to safely manage patients by more conservative methods.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the long term outcome of patients with vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. DESIGN: A retrospective study using information obtained from patient casenotes. SAMPLE: One hundred and thirty-three women with a primary diagnosis of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN), identified during a 15-year period. RESULTS: The diagnosis of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia increased throughout the study period. Human papilloma virus changes were noted in 104 patients (78%); these women were significantly younger than those without (P < or = 0.001). Nineteen (14%) were managed by observation or medical treatment and the remainder by surgical methods. Histological or symptomatic recurrence after surgical treatment occurred in 55 (48%). When disease recurred, it usually did so within four years of treatment. Recurrence was more common following laser vapourisation than after local excision (75% vs 40%; P < or = 0.01). Progression to invasive disease occurred in nine patients (7%), none of whom were in the group being observed. Four deaths occurred in this group, three from gynaecological malignancies of the lower genital tract. CONCLUSION:Patients with vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia require long term follow up, and the risk of invasion may be higher than previously thought. Surgical treatment when required should be by excisional rather than ablative methods in most instances. In selected cases it is also possible to safely manage patients by more conservative methods.
Authors: Karthik C Bassetty; Anitha Thomas; Rachel G Chandy; Dhanya S Thomas; Vinotha Thomas; Abraham Peedicayil; Ajit Sebastian Journal: J Obstet Gynaecol India Date: 2022-04-06
Authors: J J Wallbillich; H E Rhodes; A M Milbourne; M F Munsell; M Frumovitz; J Brown; C L Trimble; K M Schmeler Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2012-08-04 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Peter L Stern; Sjoerd H van der Burg; Ian N Hampson; Thomas R Broker; Alison Fiander; Charles J Lacey; Henry C Kitchener; Mark H Einstein Journal: Vaccine Date: 2012-11-20 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Antonio Frega; Francesco Sopracordevole; Paolo Scirpa; Alberto Biamonti; Laura Lorenzon; Simona Scarani; Luana De Sanctis; Arianna Pacchiarotti; Massimo Moscarini; Deborah French Journal: Med Sci Monit Date: 2011-09
Authors: Helen C Stankiewicz Karita; Kirsten Hauge; Amalia Magaret; Constance Mao; Jeffrey Schouten; Verena Grieco; Long Fu Xi; Denise A Galloway; Margaret M Madeleine; Anna Wald Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2019-04-05
Authors: Mathias K Fehr; Marc Baumann; Michael Mueller; Daniel Fink; Siegfried Heinzl; Patrick Imesch; Konstantin Dedes Journal: J Gynecol Oncol Date: 2013-07-04 Impact factor: 4.401
Authors: Margaret M Madeleine; Lisa G Johnson; David R Doody; Elaine R Tipton; Joseph J Carter; Denise A Galloway Journal: J Low Genit Tract Dis Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 1.925