Literature DB >> 8624167

The use of living wills at the end of life. A national study.

L C Hanson1, E Rodgman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Knowing more about who uses living wills may help explain their limited acceptance.
METHODS: We analyzed the 1986 National Mortality Followback Survey, a random sample of all US deaths linked to a survey about decedents' use of living wills, their social and health status, and their use of medical services. Decedents with and without living wills were compared for differences in social and health characteristics and use of medical services.
RESULTS: There were 16,678 decedents; 9.8% had a living will. Rates of use were higher for decedents who were white (10.7%), were female (11.0%), had private insurance (13.8%), had incomes of $22,000 or more (14.5%), or had college educations (18.7%). The use of living wills was lower among blacks (2.7%), Medicaid recipients (6.3%), those with incomes of less than $5,000 (7.5%), or those with less than 8 years of education (4.0%). Health was also related to use of living wills. Functionally independent persons were unlikely to have a living will (5.5%); use increased with dependency. Cognitive impairment made it less likely that a decedent had a living will (6.7%). Persons who died of cancer (16.4%) or pulmonary disease (11.4%) were more likely to have one. All demographic and health characteristics remained significant in multivariate analyses. Controlling for health status, decedents with living wills used more physician visits (five to nine vs two to four, P < .001) and hospital days (37 vs 30, P < .001). Although more likely to use hospices (19.5% vs 8.4%, P < .001) and half as likely to receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation or ventilatory support, they were still 20% more likely to die in the hospital.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who are black, poorly educated, underinsured, or cognitively impaired are least likely to prepare a living will. Decedents with living wills forgo specific treatments, but remain intensive users of routine medical services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8624167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  29 in total

1.  Withholding artificial feeding from the severely demented: merciful or immoral? Contrasts between secular and Jewish perspectives.

Authors:  J Kunin
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  MRSA in The Netherlands: preventive measure raises a moral issue.

Authors:  D O E Gebhardt
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Religiosity, spirituality, and end-of-life planning: a single-site survey of medical inpatients.

Authors:  Kyle E Karches; Grace S Chung; Vineet Arora; David O Meltzer; Farr A Curlin
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  Completion of advanced care directives is associated with willingness to donate.

Authors:  J Daryl Thornton; J Randall Curtis; Margaret D Allen
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.798

5.  Engaging homeless persons in end of life preparations.

Authors:  John Song; Melanie M Wall; Edward R Ratner; Dianne M Bartels; Nancy Ulvestad; Lillian Gelberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  A clinical framework for improving the advance care planning process: start with patients' self-identified barriers.

Authors:  Adam D Schickedanz; Dean Schillinger; C Seth Landefeld; Sara J Knight; Brie A Williams; Rebecca L Sudore
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Deciding in the dark: advance directives and continuation of treatment in chronic critical illness.

Authors:  Sharon L Camhi; Alice F Mercado; R Sean Morrison; Qingling Du; David M Platt; Gary I August; Judith E Nelson
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Advance directives in nursing homes: prevalence, validity, significance, and nursing staff adherence.

Authors:  Sarah Sommer; Georg Marckmann; Michael Pentzek; Karl Wegscheider; Heinz-Harald Abholz; Jürgen in der Schmitten
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  Frequency and correlates of advance planning among cognitively impaired older adults.

Authors:  Jennifer Hagerty Lingler; Karen B Hirschman; Linda Garand; Mary Amanda Dew; James T Becker; Richard Schulz; Steven T Dekosky
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.105

10.  Physicians's reports on the impact of living wills at the end of life in Japan.

Authors:  Y Masuda; M D Fetters; A Hattori; N Mogi; M Naito; A Iguchi; K Uemura
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.903

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.