Literature DB >> 8623943

Force and torque vary between laryngoscopists and laryngoscope blades.

R H Hastings1, E D Hon, C Nghiem, E A Wahrenbrock.   

Abstract

Several studies have examined the effects of patient characteristics on force of laryngoscopy, but little attention has been paid to the importance of technique and equipment. This study investigated whether force, torque, head extension, and view varied significantly between laryngoscopists and compared force and torque using Macintosh 3 and Miller 2 blades. The study population consisted of ASA grade I and II patients requiring general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation for elective surgery. Force, torque, head extension, and laryngeal view were highly reproducible when laryngoscopy was repeated by the same individual, Force and torque showed great variation between laryngoscopies performed by different anesthetists, For example, peak force varied over a range of 56 newtons among patients, but could also vary as much as 30 newtons between different anesthetists repeating laryngoscopy in the same patient. Force and head extension were 30% less with Miller laryngoscope compared to the Macintosh. Thus, laryngoscopic force and torque depend on technique and equipment. Further studies of force and torque may lead to improved techniques. The force-measuring laryngoscope could be a useful tool in teaching laryngoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8623943     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199603000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  12 in total

1.  Comparison of the strength of various disposable videolaryngoscope blades.

Authors:  Jongbong Choi; Yeongtak Song; Heekyung Lee; Yongil Cho; Tae Hee Han; Tae Ho Lim
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 6.713

2.  Intubation Biomechanics: Laryngoscope Force and Cervical Spine Motion during Intubation in Cadavers-Cadavers versus Patients, the Effect of Repeated Intubations, and the Effect of Type II Odontoid Fracture on C1-C2 Motion.

Authors:  Bradley J Hindman; Robert P From; Ricardo B Fontes; Vincent C Traynelis; Michael M Todd; M Bridget Zimmerman; Christian M Puttlitz; Brandon G Santoni
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Direct versus indirect laryngoscopy using a Macintosh video laryngoscope: a mannequin study comparing applied forces.

Authors:  Joanna K Gordon; Vaughan E Bertram; Francesco Cavallin; Matteo Parotto; Richard M Cooper
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Intubation biomechanics: laryngoscope force and cervical spine motion during intubation with Macintosh and Airtraq laryngoscopes.

Authors:  Bradley J Hindman; Brandon G Santoni; Christian M Puttlitz; Robert P From; Michael M Todd
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Manikin Laryngoscopy Motion as a Predictor of Patient Intubation Outcomes: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Randolph H Hastings; Suraj Kedarisetty; Jennifer Moitoza Johnson; Dale Glaser; Nathan Delson
Journal:  J Educ Perioper Med       Date:  2018-01-01

6.  Development of an Endotracheal Intubation Formative Assessment Tool.

Authors:  Adam Ryason; Emil R Petrusa; Uwe Kruger; Zhaohui Xia; Vanessa T Wong; Daniel B Jones; Suvranu De; Stephanie B Jones
Journal:  J Educ Perioper Med       Date:  2020-01-01

7.  Prediction of difficult intubations using conventional indicators: Does rapid sequence intubation ease difficult intubations? A prospective randomised study in a tertiary care teaching hospital.

Authors:  Lakshmi Gangadharan; C Sreekanth; Mabel C Vasnaik
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2011-01

8.  I-gel Laryngeal Mask Airway Combined with Tracheal Intubation Attenuate Systemic Stress Response in Patients Undergoing Posterior Fossa Surgery.

Authors:  Chaoliang Tang; Xiaoqing Chai; Fang Kang; Xiang Huang; Tao Hou; Fei Tang; Juan Li
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 4.711

9.  Macintosh blade entrapment during direct laryngoscopy.

Authors:  Ghanshyam Yadav; Gaurav Jain
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2014-05

10.  Mechanical strain to maxillary incisors during direct laryngoscopy.

Authors:  Milo Engoren; Lauryn R Rochlen; Matthew V Diehl; Sarah S Sherman; Elizabeth Jewell; Mary Golinski; Paul Begeman; John M Cavanaugh
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.