Literature DB >> 8623854

The current status of multifetal pregnancy reduction.

R L Berkowitz1, L Lynch, J Stone, M Alvarez.   

Abstract

The number of women conceiving three or more fetuses has increased dramatically as a result of successful infertility therapy with ovulation-inducing agents and assisted reproductive technology. Higher-order multiple gestations have an increased risk of premature delivery and its attendant sequelae of increased neonatal mortality or irreversible morbidity. Multifetal pregnancy reduction is a procedure designed to decrease the increased propensity to deliver very prematurely in these patients by reducing the number of live fetuses they are carrying. The procedure has proved to be both safe and effective, and pregnancies reduced to twins proceed as if that were the number of fetuses originally conceived. Nevertheless, this invasive procedure does have the potential to result in loss of the entire pregnancy and causes considerable emotional distress for some couples who view it as their "least bad" alternative. The medical benefits of performing multifetal pregnancy reduction in women with four or more fetuses seem fairly well established, but this is less true for triplets. Serious attention should be paid to reducing the number of higher-order multiple pregnancies resulting from infertility therapy. In the meantime, when three or more fetuses have been conceived, multifetal pregnancy reduction offers a reasonable option to patients whose only choices in the past were either to accept the risk of delivering extremely prematurely or to terminate the entire pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8623854     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70669-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  8 in total

1.  From twin to singleton.

Authors:  R L Berkowitz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-08-17

Review 2.  Women's reproductive autonomy: medicalisation and beyond.

Authors:  L Purdy
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Embryo reduction: our experience.

Authors:  Pankaj Talwar; R K Sharma; K Sandeep; Shashi Sareen; B S Duggal
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-08-07

4.  The influence of supernumerary embryos on the clinical outcome of IVF cycles.

Authors:  O Salha; T Dada; S Levett; V Allgar; V Sharma
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Number of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  Zabeena Pandian; Jane Marjoribanks; Ozkan Ozturk; Gamal Serour; Siladitya Bhattacharya
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-07-29

6.  Number of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  Mohan S Kamath; Mariano Mascarenhas; Richard Kirubakaran; Siladitya Bhattacharya
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-08-21

Review 7.  Screening and Invasive Testing in Twins.

Authors:  Giovanni Monni; Ambra Iuculano; Maria Angelica Zoppi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Specialists' Attitude toward Appropriate Number of Transferable Embryos in Assisted Reproductive Technology in Iran.

Authors:  Zohreh Behjati Ardakani; Malihe Zaman Momeniha; Fereshteh Azedi; Kourosh Kamali; Mohammad Mehdi Akhondi
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2011-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.