Literature DB >> 8623186

Graft function and outcome of older (> or = 60 years) donor livers.

W K Washburn1, L B Johnson, W D Lewis, R L Jenkins.   

Abstract

Livers from donors > or = 60 years of age are often considered inadequate for transplantation by many centers. With waiting times exceeding 1 year in our region, we have aggressively used livers from this donor age group. Between 1990 and 1994, 209 patients received 223 liver grafts at our institution. Of these, 29 (13%) were from donors > or = 60 years of age (group A) and 194 (87%) were from donors < 60 years of age (group B). The two groups were matched for recipient diagnosis and severity of disease. Group A and B donors had similar liver, renal, and hematologic studies prior to donation. Weight, sex, race and vasopressor requirement were also similar. Postoperative alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase,and prothrombin time were not significantly different over the first 10 postoperative days. Group A grafts were significantly more cholestatic than group B grafts on postoperative days 6-10. The retransplantation rate for primary graft nonfunction was not significantly different from group A (6.7%) and group B (3.4%; P=0.04). Patient and graft survival rates at 1 year were 58.6 % and 44.8% for group A and 79.2% and 74.5% for group B (P<0.001 for both). Four of 12 deaths in the first year in group A were completely unrelated to graft function. If these are excluded, patient and graft survival rates were 68% and 52%, which are better but still significantly less than in group B. Initial graft function of older donor livers are similar to that of the matched younger group. However, patient and graft survival rates were significantly worse for the older donors, even when corrected for unrelated deaths. Livers should not be discarded based on age alone without inspection and/or biopsy to rule out significant steatosis. Prompt retransplantation for primary graft nonfunction of older donors are generally more cholestatic than those from the younger donor age group; however, many of them function quite well. At the present time, given the inability to identify donor variables associated with decreased recipient survival, we recommend cautious use of older liver grafts in healthier recipients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8623186     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199604150-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  10 in total

Review 1.  Transplant for the very sick: No limitations in donor quality?

Authors:  Jennifer C Lai
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 2.  Using old liver grafts for liver transplantation: where are the limits?

Authors:  Carlos Jiménez-Romero; Oscar Caso Maestro; Félix Cambra Molero; Iago Justo Alonso; Cristina Alegre Torrado; Alejandro Manrique Municio; Jorge Calvo Pulido; Carmelo Loinaz Segurola; Enrique Moreno González
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Liver function declines with increased age.

Authors:  Kasia P Cieslak; Onno Baur; Joanne Verheij; Roelof J Bennink; Thomas M van Gulik
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Living related liver transplantation: medical and social aspects of a controversial therapy.

Authors:  C E Broelsch; G Testa; A Alexandrou; M Malagó
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Donation after cardiac death: the University of Wisconsin experience with liver transplantation.

Authors:  David P Foley; Luis A Fernandez; Glen Leverson; L Thomas Chin; Nancy Krieger; Jeffery T Cooper; Brian D Shames; Yolanda T Becker; Jon S Odorico; Stuart J Knechtle; Hans W Sollinger; Munci Kalayoglu; Anthony M D'Alessandro
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Expanding the donor pool for liver transplantation.

Authors:  J F Trotter
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2000-02

Review 7.  Current concept of small-for-size grafts in living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Toru Ikegami; Mitsuo Shimada; Satoru Imura; Yusuke Arakawa; Akira Nii; Yuji Morine; Hirofumi Kanemura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 8.  Expanded criteria donors.

Authors:  Sandy Feng; Jennifer C Lai
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 6.126

9.  Liver regeneration and aging: a current perspective.

Authors:  Douglas L Schmucker; Henry Sanchez
Journal:  Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res       Date:  2011-09-08

Review 10.  An Update on Usage of High-Risk Donors in Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Haris Muhammad; Duha Zaffar; Aniqa Tehreem; Peng-Sheng Ting; Cem Simsek; Ilker Turan; Saleh Alqahtani; Behnam Saberi; Ahmet Gurakar
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 4.241

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.