BACKGROUND: Treatment of hemophilia patients with recombinant factor VIII concentrates has not previously been associated with anaphylaxis. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A 5-week-old boy with severe hemophilia A developed dyspnea, cyanosis, hypotension, and a diffuse urticarial rash following treatment with a recombinant factor VIII (Recombinate). To identify the cause of anaphylaxis in this patient, the vial lot was examined for the presence of endotoxin, and a checkerboard immunoblotting technique was used to test serum and/or plasma samples from the patient and mother for the presence of antibodies (IgA, IgG, IgE, and IgM) to Recombinate-related antigens (recombinant factor VIII, von Willebrand factor, human serum albumin, Chinese hamster ovary proteins, bovine serum albumin, mouse monoclonal anti-human factor VIII, polyethylene glycol 3350), and to ethylene oxide, the agent used to sterilize the infusion equipment. RESULTS: No immune response directed against the Recombinate-related antigens or ethylene oxide that could be associated with the anaphylactic reaction was identified. Endotoxin was not present upon rabbit pyrogen testing of the therapeutic product. CONCLUSION: These studies failed to show any association between Recombinate and the onset of the allergic reaction. This seems to be the first reported case of anaphylaxis following the infusion of a recombinant form of factor VIII concentrate.
BACKGROUND: Treatment of hemophiliapatients with recombinant factor VIII concentrates has not previously been associated with anaphylaxis. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A 5-week-old boy with severe hemophilia A developed dyspnea, cyanosis, hypotension, and a diffuse urticarial rash following treatment with a recombinant factor VIII (Recombinate). To identify the cause of anaphylaxis in this patient, the vial lot was examined for the presence of endotoxin, and a checkerboard immunoblotting technique was used to test serum and/or plasma samples from the patient and mother for the presence of antibodies (IgA, IgG, IgE, and IgM) to Recombinate-related antigens (recombinant factor VIII, von Willebrand factor, human serum albumin, Chinese hamster ovary proteins, bovine serum albumin, mouse monoclonal anti-human factor VIII, polyethylene glycol 3350), and to ethylene oxide, the agent used to sterilize the infusion equipment. RESULTS: No immune response directed against the Recombinate-related antigens or ethylene oxide that could be associated with the anaphylactic reaction was identified. Endotoxin was not present upon rabbit pyrogen testing of the therapeutic product. CONCLUSION: These studies failed to show any association between Recombinate and the onset of the allergic reaction. This seems to be the first reported case of anaphylaxis following the infusion of a recombinant form of factor VIII concentrate.