Literature DB >> 8622115

Overview of the efficacy of isepamicin in the adult core clinical trial programme.

C Carbon1.   

Abstract

The efficacy of once-daily administration of isepamicin in hospitalized adult patients has been assessed in a multinational clinical trails programme. Following a small phase II programme, the phase III programmed assessed four main indications: lower respiratory tract infections (including nosocomial pneumonia), urinary tract, intra-abdominal and skin and soft tissue infections. The phase III trials were open, prospective, multicentre studies in which 1443 patients were randomised to receive either isepamicin (n = 1005) or amikacin (n = 438). The daily dose of isepamicin was dependent on the severity of infection (8 or 15 mg/kg once daily) while all patients received amikacin 7.5 mg/kg twice daily. A study of patients with nosocomial pneumonia had an additional treatment arm of isepamicin 7.5 mg/kg twice daily. The aminoglycosides were combined with other antimicrobial agents in accordance with current clinical practice depending on the site and severity of the infection and the type of organism isolated. Overall, clinical cure or improvement response rates of the isepamicin and amikacin regimens were comparable, ranging from 76-95% in the intent-to-treat population. Lower clinical response rates (62-63%) was observed in severely ill patients with nosocomial pneumonia in both the isepamicin and amikacin treatment groups. In the efficacy population, organism elimination rates of 90% were achieved with isepamicin and amikacin. Therefore, in adult patients with a wide range of infections requiring aminoglycoside therapy, once-daily dosing with isepamicin is as effective as twice- daily dosing with amikacin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8622115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chemother        ISSN: 1120-009X            Impact factor:   1.714


  3 in total

1.  In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility to isepamicin of 6,296 Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates collected at a tertiary care university hospital in Greece.

Authors:  Sofia Maraki; George Samonis; Drosos E Karageorgopoulos; Michael N Mavros; Diamantis Kofteridis; Matthew E Falagas
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Which aminoglycoside or fluoroquinolone is more active against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in mice?

Authors:  N Lounis; B Ji; C Truffot-Pernot; J Grosset
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Interventions for cellulitis and erysipelas.

Authors:  Sally A Kilburn; Peter Featherstone; Bernie Higgins; Richard Brindle
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-06-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.