PURPOSE: To describe the treatment of retinoblastoma at a single institution using a prospective protocol based on histopathologic staging. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 116 consecutive patients (101 eligible, 46 bilateral) from August 1987 to December 1993. Treatment was enucleation or conservative therapy for intraocular disease (stage I patients). Stage II patients (orbital or postlaminar invasion) received vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin for 57 weeks. Patients with orbital mass and extension beyond the cut end of the optic nerve also received orbital radiotherapy (45 Gy). The latter received intrathecal therapy. In those with CNS (stage III) or hematogenous metastasis (stage IV), cisplatin and etoposide were added along with cranial (in patients with a CNS mass and prophylactically in stage IV) or craniospinal (in patients with positive CSF) radiotherapy. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 39 months (range, 12 to 84). The overall survival rate was 0.84. Survival rates according to stage were as follows: stage I probability of overall survival [pOS] = 0.97) (alive/total), 59 of 60; stage II (pOS = 0.85) including patients with scattered episcleral cells, three of three; orbital mass, one of one; postlaminar invasion up to and beyond the cut end of optic nerve, 10 of 11 and 11 of 14, respectively; of stage III (pOS = 0), zero of six; and stage IV (pOS = 0.50), three of six. Only those patients with preauricular adenopathy as the only metastatic site survived in the latter group. Acute toxicity was mild. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy is not warranted to prevent systemic metastasis for intraocular disease. Patients with extraocular orbital disease and had a good outcome with this therapy. Patients with metastatic disease fared poorly, except for those with isolated malignant preauricular adenopathy.
PURPOSE: To describe the treatment of retinoblastoma at a single institution using a prospective protocol based on histopathologic staging. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 116 consecutive patients (101 eligible, 46 bilateral) from August 1987 to December 1993. Treatment was enucleation or conservative therapy for intraocular disease (stage I patients). Stage II patients (orbital or postlaminar invasion) received vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin for 57 weeks. Patients with orbital mass and extension beyond the cut end of the optic nerve also received orbital radiotherapy (45 Gy). The latter received intrathecal therapy. In those with CNS (stage III) or hematogenous metastasis (stage IV), cisplatin and etoposide were added along with cranial (in patients with a CNS mass and prophylactically in stage IV) or craniospinal (in patients with positive CSF) radiotherapy. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 39 months (range, 12 to 84). The overall survival rate was 0.84. Survival rates according to stage were as follows: stage I probability of overall survival [pOS] = 0.97) (alive/total), 59 of 60; stage II (pOS = 0.85) including patients with scattered episcleral cells, three of three; orbital mass, one of one; postlaminar invasion up to and beyond the cut end of optic nerve, 10 of 11 and 11 of 14, respectively; of stage III (pOS = 0), zero of six; and stage IV (pOS = 0.50), three of six. Only those patients with preauricular adenopathy as the only metastatic site survived in the latter group. Acute toxicity was mild. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy is not warranted to prevent systemic metastasis for intraocular disease. Patients with extraocular orbital disease and had a good outcome with this therapy. Patients with metastatic disease fared poorly, except for those with isolated malignant preauricular adenopathy.
Authors: Vassiliki Poulaki; Constantine S Mitsiades; Antonia M Joussen; Alexandra Lappas; Bernd Kirchhof; Nicholas Mitsiades Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Carlos A Leal-Leal; Roberto Rivera-Luna; Martha Flores-Rojo; Juan C Juárez-Echenique; Juan C Ordaz; Jorge Amador-Zarco Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Jose Luis Lopez; Patricia Cabrera; Rafael Ordoñez; Catalina Marquez; Gema Lucia Ramirez; Juan Manuel Praena-Fernandez; Maria Jose Ortiz Journal: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Date: 2011-03-12
Authors: Verónica Pérez; Claudia Sampor; Guadalupe Rey; Andreu Parareda-Salles; Katherine Kopp; Agustín P Dabezies; Gustavo Dufort; Marta Zelter; Juan P López; Marcelo Urbieta; Elisa Alcalde-Ruiz; Jaume Catala-Mora; Mariona Suñol; Diego Ossandon; Adriana C Fandiño; J Oscar Croxatto; María T G de Dávila; Gregory Reaman; Yaddanapudi Ravindranath; Guillermo L Chantada Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: C Leal-Leal; M Flores-Rojo; A Medina-Sansón; F Cerecedo-Díaz; S Sánchez-Félix; O González-Ramella; F Pérez-Pérez; R Gómez-Martínez; A Quero-Hernández; E Altamirano-Alvarez; F Alejo-González; J Figueroa-Carbajal; A Ellis-Irigoyen; I Tejocote-Romero; R Cervantes-Paz; F Pantoja-Guillén; L Vega-Vega; F Carrete-Ramírez Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; Mathew W Wilson; Guillermo Chantada; Ligia Fu; Ibrahim Qaddoumi; Célia Antoneli; Carlos Leal-Leal; Tarun Sharma; Margarita Barnoya; Sidnei Epelman; Louis Pizzarello; Javier R Kane; Ray Barfield; Thomas E Merchant; Leslie L Robison; A Linn Murphree; Patricia Chevez-Barrios; Michael A Dyer; Joan O'Brien; Raul C Ribeiro; John Hungerford; Eugene M Helveston; Barrett G Haik; Judith Wilimas Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 7.124