Literature DB >> 8622030

Influence of age on the treatment of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer.

L L Siu1, F A Shepherd, N Murray, R Feld, J Pater, B Zee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic importance of age on response rate and survival in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), and to determine the effect of age on chemotherapy dose delivery and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We undertook a retrospective analysis of data from two multicenter, randomized trials conducted by the National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC) in which 608 SCLC patients who presented with limited disease (LD) all received the same chemotherapy. Treatment consisted of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine (CAV), and etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) administered in an immediate or delayed alternating fashion, plus cranial and thoracic irradiation.
RESULTS: There were 520 patients aged less than 70 years, and 88 > or = 70. No significant differences existed between the two age groups in baseline characteristics, including treatment protocol, performance status, and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level. There were more men in the older group (P = .05). Overall response rates were comparable (78% v 82%, P = .50), and 5-year survival rates were also similar (P = .14), with 11% alive in the younger group and 8% in the older group. Age was a significant predictor of overall survival when analyzed as a continuous variable in a univariate model (P = .01), but it was no longer an independent prognostic factor in our multivariate regression analysis. An analysis of chemotherapy delivery between the two age groups showed that patients aged > or = 70 years received lower total doses of each drug compared with the intended full protocol dose, primarily as a result of dose omissions, rather than dose reductions. The frequency of dose delays was not different between groups. No significant differences were seen in the incidence of either hematologic or most nonhematologic toxicities.
CONCLUSION: Age is not a significant adverse prognostic variable in SCLC patients with LD. Moderately aggressive chemotherapy may be delivered safely to elderly patients with a good performance status, although modest attenuation of therapy through either dose reduction or omission may occur more frequently in this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8622030     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.3.821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  18 in total

Review 1.  Limited stage small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  N Murray; F Sheehan
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2001-02

Review 2.  Merkel cell carcinoma of skin: diagnosis and management strategies.

Authors:  Michael Poulsen
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 3.  Treatment and outcomes for elderly patients with small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  R J Stephens; D H Johnson
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Safety and effectiveness of stereotactic body radiotherapy for a clinically diagnosed primary stage I lung cancer without pathological confirmation.

Authors:  Katsuyuki Sakanaka; Yukinori Matsuo; Yasushi Nagata; Sayo Maki; Keiko Shibuya; Yoshiki Norihisa; Masaru Narabayashi; Nami Ueki; Takashi Mizowaki; Masahiro Hiraoka
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Prognostic factors for limited-stage small cell lung cancer: a study of 284 patients.

Authors:  Jun Chen; Ruoxiang Jiang; Yolanda I Garces; Aminah Jatoi; Shawn M Stoddard; Zhifu Sun; Randolph S Marks; Yunpeng Liu; Ping Yang
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 5.705

Review 6.  Modern management of small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Roberta Ferraldeschi; Sofia Baka; Babita Jyoti; Corinne Faivre-Finn; Nick Thatcher; Paul Lorigan
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Treatment of limited-stage small cell lung cancer in the elderly, chemotherapy vs. sequential chemoradiotherapy vs. concurrent chemoradiotherapy: that's the question.

Authors:  Cesare Gridelli; Francesca Casaluce; Assunta Sgambato; Fabio Monaco; Cesare Guida
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2016-04

8.  Radiation-related lymphopenia as a new prognostic factor in limited-stage small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Oyeon Cho; Young-Taek Oh; Mison Chun; O Kyu Noh; Hyun-Woo Lee
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-08-12

9.  Phase II trial of carboplatin plus oral etoposide for elderly patients with small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  K Matsui; N Masuda; M Fukuoka; T Yana; T Hirashima; T Komiya; M Kobayashi; M Kawahara; S Atagi; M Ogawara; S Negoro; S Kudoh; K Furuse
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Randomised phase III trial of carboplatin plus etoposide vs split doses of cisplatin plus etoposide in elderly or poor-risk patients with extensive disease small-cell lung cancer: JCOG 9702.

Authors:  H Okamoto; K Watanabe; H Kunikane; A Yokoyama; S Kudoh; T Asakawa; T Shibata; H Kunitoh; T Tamura; N Saijo
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.