R A Kennis1, E J Rosser, N B Olivier, R W Walker. 1. Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824-1314, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To define the extent to which Malassezia organisms can be recovered from the skin of clinically normal dogs and to assess differences in organism recovery related to anatomic sampling site and to method of collection. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled study. ANIMALS: 19 clinically normal dogs. PROCEDURE: The number of Malassezia pachydermatis organisms were determined in fungal cultures of samples obtained from the skin of clinically normal dogs, using an adhesive tape method to obtain samples from 10 sites/dog. Additionally, 3 methods (direct impression, swabbing technique, and superficial skin scraping) that are commonly used for obtaining samples for cytologic examination were evaluated. RESULTS: Malassezia organisms were found in low numbers as part of the microflora of the skin of clinically normal dogs. Number of organisms differed significantly for various anatomic locations (chin, highest number; inguinal and axillary regions, lowest number). Malassezia organisms were identified more frequently by use of adhesive tape and fungal culturing than by the methods used for cytologic examination. However, comparing methods used for obtaining samples for cytologic examination with each other, marked differences were not detected in our ability to recover yeast organisms among the 3 techniques. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Although Malassezia spp is part of the microflora of the skin of clinically normal dogs, it is extremely difficult to detect the organism by any of the 3 sampling methods used for sample collection for cytologic examination. Therefore, anatomic site and method of sample collection should be considered when attempting to make a diagnosis of Malassezia dermatitis.
OBJECTIVE: To define the extent to which Malassezia organisms can be recovered from the skin of clinically normal dogs and to assess differences in organism recovery related to anatomic sampling site and to method of collection. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled study. ANIMALS: 19 clinically normal dogs. PROCEDURE: The number of Malassezia pachydermatis organisms were determined in fungal cultures of samples obtained from the skin of clinically normal dogs, using an adhesive tape method to obtain samples from 10 sites/dog. Additionally, 3 methods (direct impression, swabbing technique, and superficial skin scraping) that are commonly used for obtaining samples for cytologic examination were evaluated. RESULTS:Malassezia organisms were found in low numbers as part of the microflora of the skin of clinically normal dogs. Number of organisms differed significantly for various anatomic locations (chin, highest number; inguinal and axillary regions, lowest number). Malassezia organisms were identified more frequently by use of adhesive tape and fungal culturing than by the methods used for cytologic examination. However, comparing methods used for obtaining samples for cytologic examination with each other, marked differences were not detected in our ability to recover yeast organisms among the 3 techniques. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Although Malassezia spp is part of the microflora of the skin of clinically normal dogs, it is extremely difficult to detect the organism by any of the 3 sampling methods used for sample collection for cytologic examination. Therefore, anatomic site and method of sample collection should be considered when attempting to make a diagnosis of Malassezia dermatitis.
Authors: Kerith R Luchins; Kate C Baker; Margaret H Gilbert; James L Blanchard; David Xianhong Liu; Leann Myers; Rudolf P Bohm Journal: J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 1.232
Authors: Courtney Meason-Smith; Alison Diesel; Adam P Patterson; Caitlin E Older; Joanne M Mansell; Jan S Suchodolski; Aline Rodrigues Hoffmann Journal: FEMS Microbiol Ecol Date: 2015-11-04 Impact factor: 4.194
Authors: Guangxi Wu; He Zhao; Chenhao Li; Menaka Priyadarsani Rajapakse; Wing Cheong Wong; Jun Xu; Charles W Saunders; Nancy L Reeder; Raymond A Reilman; Annika Scheynius; Sheng Sun; Blake Robert Billmyre; Wenjun Li; Anna Floyd Averette; Piotr Mieczkowski; Joseph Heitman; Bart Theelen; Markus S Schröder; Paola Florez De Sessions; Geraldine Butler; Sebastian Maurer-Stroh; Teun Boekhout; Niranjan Nagarajan; Thomas L Dawson Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2015-11-05 Impact factor: 5.917