Literature DB >> 8621298

Dose to contralateral breast: a comparison of four primary breast irradiation techniques.

C A Kelly1, X Y Wang, J C Chu, W F Hartsell.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Contralateral breast dose from primary breast irradiation has been implicated in the risk of second breast malignancies. It has been previously shown that the use of half-beam blocking can increase the opposite breast dose by a factor of five. This study evaluates four different breast treatment techniques to compare the radiation dose to the contralateral breast. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Dose measurements were made using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) capsules, which were placed in the Rando phantom in the following locations in the contralateral breast: seven along the central axis plane, on at 5 cm superior to, and one 5 cm inferior to the central axis plane. One TLD capsule was placed in the midcenter of the treated breast. The following radiation techniques were used: (a) half-beam with a custom block (HB+CB), (b) half-beam using asymmetric collimator jaw (HB/AJ), (c) half-beam using asymmetric collimator jaw with custom block (H/AJ+CB), and (d) isocentric technique with nondivergent posterior borders [Joint Center for Radiation Therapy (JCRT) techique]. For each technique, isodose distributions for the Rando phantom were optimized using (a) 15 degree medial and lateral compensating wedges, and (b) a single 30 degree lateral compensating wedge. The phantom was treated with 6 MV photons. Each technique was repeated six times, and the TLD readings were averaged.
RESULTS: The custom cerrobend half-beam block technique gives the highest contralateral breast dose, regardless of wedge. The remaining techniques give results in a similar range, with the asymmetric jaw with no medial wedge technique giving the lowest total dose (p = not significant). The use of a medial wedge increases the opposite breast dose for all techniques. The asymmetric half-beam technique gives significantly less dose than the cerrobend half-beam technique, due to decreased transmission through the asymmetric collimators. The asymmetric jaw vs JCRT technique results in similar contralateral breast dose.
CONCLUSIONS: As expected, dose to the contralateral breast increases with the use of a medial wedge. Cerrobend half-beam blocking gives the highest opposite breast dose. The lowest contralateral breast dose is with the asymmetric jaw with no medial wedge and no block. The asymmetric jaw technique with block yields equivalent contralateral breast doses to the JCRT technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8621298     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)02051-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  8 in total

1.  Dose to the contralateral breast from radiotherapy and risk of second primary breast cancer in the WECARE study.

Authors:  Marilyn Stovall; Susan A Smith; Bryan M Langholz; John D Boice; Roy E Shore; Michael Andersson; Thomas A Buchholz; Marinela Capanu; Leslie Bernstein; Charles F Lynch; Kathleen E Malone; Hoda Anton-Culver; Robert W Haile; Barry S Rosenstein; Anne S Reiner; Duncan C Thomas; Jonine L Bernstein
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Growth of breast cancer recurrences assessed by consecutive MRI.

Authors:  Ingrid Millet; Emmanuelle Bouic-Pages; Denis Hoa; David Azria; Patrice Taourel
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Contralateral breast dose from partial breast brachytherapy.

Authors:  R Cole Robinson; Christopher L Nelson; Elizabeth S Bloom; Kelly D Kisling; Bryan E Mason; Gary D Fisher; Steven M Kirsner
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Dosimetric Comparison of Treatment Plans Using Physical Wedge and Enhanced Dynamic Wedge for the Planning of Breast Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Zhenia Gopalakrishnan; Raghuram K Nair; P Raghukumar; B Sarin
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

5.  Evaluation of the Lung Dose in Three-dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy of Left-Sided Breast Cancer: A Phantom Study.

Authors:  Mahsa Abdemanafi; Mohammad Bagher Tavakoli; Ali Akhavan; Iraj Abedi
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2020-02-06

6.  Dosimetric comparison of intensity modulated radiotherapy isocentric field plans and field in field (FIF) forward plans in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Zakiya Salem Al-Rahbi; Zahid Al Mandhari; Ramamoorthy Ravichandran; Fatma Al-Kindi; Cheriyathmanjiyil Anthony Davis; Saju Bhasi; Namrata Satyapal; Balakrishnan Rajan
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2013-01

7.  The impact of adjuvant therapy on contralateral breast cancer risk and the prognostic significance of contralateral breast cancer: a population based study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Michael Schaapveld; Otto Visser; W J Louwman; Pax H B Willemse; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Winette T A van der Graaf; Renée Otter; Jan Willem W Coebergh; Flora E van Leeuwen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Calculation of organ doses from breast cancer radiotherapy: a Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  Theocharis Berris; Michael Mazonakis; John Stratakis; Antonios Tzedakis; Anastasia Fasoulaki; John Damilakis
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.