PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of eversion of the anorectum during restorative proctocolectomy (RP) for ulcerative colitis on functional outcome. METHODS: One hundred seventeen patients underwent RP with stapled end-to-end ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (EEA), without resection of the anal mucosa. Sixty-four underwent EEA with eversion of the anorectum, and 53 underwent EEA without eversion. Each patient underwent paired studies of anorectal function before and a median of 12 months after RP. RESULTS: One year after RP, median (interquartile range) maximum resting pressure was 69 (range, 51-88) cmH2O in those patients who underwent eversion vs. 80 (range, 64-90) cmH2O in patients without eversion (P < 0.04). Threshold sensation in the upper, middle, and lower thirds of the anal canal were 9.1, 7.4, and 6.8 mA after eversion vs. 6.9, 4.9, and 3.8 mA without eversion (P = 0.003, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). Before operation, all patients had a rectoanal inhibitory reflex; however, after RP, 54 of 64 patients in the eversion group and 50 of 53 patients with a stapled EEA without eversion had an inhibitory reflex (P = not significant). Leakage of mucus was experienced by 11 patients who underwent eversion, compared with 9 patients without eversion. Fifty-six of 64 patients with eversion could defer defecation for more than 30 min compared with 43 of 53 patients without eversion. Twenty-two of 64 patients in the eversion group retained perfect discrimination between flatus and feces compared with 38 of 54 without eversion (P < 0.001). Level of the anastomosis was 1 (range, 0.5-3) cm above dentate line after eversion compared with 1.5 (range, 0-6) cm without eversion. CONCLUSION: Clinical outcome after RP with eversion was not as good as outcome after stapled EEA without eversion. Such a conclusion requires confirmation in a prospective control trial.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of eversion of the anorectum during restorative proctocolectomy (RP) for ulcerative colitis on functional outcome. METHODS: One hundred seventeen patients underwent RP with stapled end-to-end ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (EEA), without resection of the anal mucosa. Sixty-four underwent EEA with eversion of the anorectum, and 53 underwent EEA without eversion. Each patient underwent paired studies of anorectal function before and a median of 12 months after RP. RESULTS: One year after RP, median (interquartile range) maximum resting pressure was 69 (range, 51-88) cmH2O in those patients who underwent eversion vs. 80 (range, 64-90) cmH2O in patients without eversion (P < 0.04). Threshold sensation in the upper, middle, and lower thirds of the anal canal were 9.1, 7.4, and 6.8 mA after eversion vs. 6.9, 4.9, and 3.8 mA without eversion (P = 0.003, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). Before operation, all patients had a rectoanal inhibitory reflex; however, after RP, 54 of 64 patients in the eversion group and 50 of 53 patients with a stapled EEA without eversion had an inhibitory reflex (P = not significant). Leakage of mucus was experienced by 11 patients who underwent eversion, compared with 9 patients without eversion. Fifty-six of 64 patients with eversion could defer defecation for more than 30 min compared with 43 of 53 patients without eversion. Twenty-two of 64 patients in the eversion group retained perfect discrimination between flatus and feces compared with 38 of 54 without eversion (P < 0.001). Level of the anastomosis was 1 (range, 0.5-3) cm above dentate line after eversion compared with 1.5 (range, 0-6) cm without eversion. CONCLUSION: Clinical outcome after RP with eversion was not as good as outcome after stapled EEA without eversion. Such a conclusion requires confirmation in a prospective control trial.