Literature DB >> 8620097

Cetirizine reduces ICAM-I on epithelial cells during nasal minimal persistent inflammation in asymptomatic children with mite-allergic asthma.

L Fasce1, G Ciprandi, C Pronzato, S Cozzani, M A Tosca, I Grimaldi, G W Canonica.   

Abstract

It has been recently demonstrated that individuals who suffer from mite allergy present mucosal inflammation even when asymptomatic. This situation is characterized by infiltration of inflammatory cells (eosinophils and neutrophils) and by ICAM-I expression on epithelial cells. It has been called 'minimal persistent inflammation' (MPI) for its relationship with natural exposure to allergen, which is continuous in the case of mite allergy. ICAM-I (or CD54) expression on epithelial cells is relevant for several reasons: (a) healthy individuals and patients with pollen allergy out of the pollen season do not express this molecule; (b) ICAM-I is the natural ligand of LFA-1 (an integrin expressed on granulocytes), and (c) ICAM-I is also receptor for rhinoviruses. It is well known that viral infections precede asthmatic attacks; consequently, this correlation is more frequent in cases of mite allergy. Cetirizine is an antiallergic drug that can reduce both inflammatory infiltrate and ICAM-I expression induced by allergen-specific conjunctival challenge. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of cetirizine on MPI in 20 children (5-14 years old) with mite allergy. All the children suffered from mild asthma and 9 also had rhinitis (they had been asymptomatic, and thus not treated, for 2 months). The study was double-blind, placebo controlled and randomized and children took Cetirizine or placebo for 15 days. At the beginning and end of the study, nasal scrapings were performed to evaluate inflammatory cell infiltration (eosinophils and neutrophils) and ICAM-I expression on epithelial cells. Cetirizine-treated children showed a significant reduction (or even total absence) of ICAM-I expression on epithelial cells (p less than 0.002) and a reduction trend in inflammatory cell counts compared with placebo. In conclusion, Cetirizine might be envisaged as fruitful for the prolonged treatment of allergic children, including during clinical latency, to prevent possible relapse or rhinovirus infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8620097     DOI: 10.1159/000237249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Allergy Immunol        ISSN: 1018-2438            Impact factor:   2.749


  6 in total

Review 1.  Cetirizine: a review of its use in children with allergic disorders.

Authors:  C M Spencer; S Noble
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  1999 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 2.  New insights into the second generation antihistamines.

Authors:  G M Walsh; L Annunziato; N Frossard; K Knol; S Levander; J M Nicolas; M Taglialatela; M D Tharp; J P Tillement; H Timmerman
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Second-generation antihistamines: actions and efficacy in the management of allergic disorders.

Authors:  Larry K Golightly; Leon S Greos
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Cetirizine: a review of its use in allergic disorders.

Authors:  Monique P Curran; Lesley J Scott; Caroline M Perry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Treatment of canine atopic dermatitis with cetirizine, a second generation antihistamine: a single-blinded, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Christopher P Cook; Danny W Scott; William H Miller; J Edward Kirker; Shaun M Cobb
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.008

6.  Clinical Evidence and Biomarkers Linking Allergy and Acute or Chronic Rhinosinusitis in Children: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Eugenio De Corso; Daniela Lucidi; Elena Cantone; Giancarlo Ottaviano; Tiziana Di Cesare; Veronica Seccia; Gaetano Paludetti; Jacopo Galli
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 4.806

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.