BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to identify the prognostic indicators for patients with stage IV hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), as well as to clarify the strategy of surgical treatment for those patients. METHODS: Forty-six patients with stage IV HCC were included in this study. Prognostic factors were univariately and multivariately analyzed. Furthermore, the significance of intraoperative treatment for residual tumors was investigated in patients with an absolute noncurative operation. RESULTS: The poor prognostic factors were as follows: host factors, Child's classification of B and C and immunosuppressive acidic protein level of greater than 400 micrograms/ml; tumor factors, tumor diameter of greater than 5 cm, poorly differentiated histologic features, positive portal vein invasion, and intrahepatic metastases involving more than three segments; others, an absolute noncurative operation and no preoperative treatment. Tumor diameter of more than 5 cm was then suggested to be an independent prognostic indicator. Survival of patients with stage IV-A HCC who underwent a curative operation was similar to that of those with stages III HCC: Furthermore, the survival of patients with Stage IV-A who had an absolute noncurative operation but underwent either intraoperative microwave coagulation or ethanol injection to the residual HCCs was not statistically different from that of those with a curative operation. CONCLUSIONS: Therefore for stage IV-A HCC surgical treatment is considered to be both useful and the first choice of treatment when all the tumors in the liver can be removed or when the residual tumors can be treated during operation by either microwave coagulation or ethanol injection as a result of an incomplete removal of the tumors.
BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to identify the prognostic indicators for patients with stage IV hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), as well as to clarify the strategy of surgical treatment for those patients. METHODS: Forty-six patients with stage IV HCC were included in this study. Prognostic factors were univariately and multivariately analyzed. Furthermore, the significance of intraoperative treatment for residual tumors was investigated in patients with an absolute noncurative operation. RESULTS: The poor prognostic factors were as follows: host factors, Child's classification of B and C and immunosuppressive acidic protein level of greater than 400 micrograms/ml; tumor factors, tumor diameter of greater than 5 cm, poorly differentiated histologic features, positive portal vein invasion, and intrahepatic metastases involving more than three segments; others, an absolute noncurative operation and no preoperative treatment. Tumor diameter of more than 5 cm was then suggested to be an independent prognostic indicator. Survival of patients with stage IV-A HCC who underwent a curative operation was similar to that of those with stages III HCC: Furthermore, the survival of patients with Stage IV-A who had an absolute noncurative operation but underwent either intraoperative microwave coagulation or ethanol injection to the residual HCCs was not statistically different from that of those with a curative operation. CONCLUSIONS: Therefore for stage IV-A HCC surgical treatment is considered to be both useful and the first choice of treatment when all the tumors in the liver can be removed or when the residual tumors can be treated during operation by either microwave coagulation or ethanol injection as a result of an incomplete removal of the tumors.