Literature DB >> 8618999

Periareolar mammaplasty: double skin technique with application of polyglactine or mixed mesh.

J C Góes1.   

Abstract

This paper presents the author's experience of 7 years in 254 patients operated on using a personal mammaplasty technique with a periareolar approach. The technique is based on the principle that the skin alone does not prevent early ptosis. This paper proposes the repositioning of all breast connective structures, treating the glandular set separately from the cutaneous lining, which is doubled, applying a circular flap of dermis with the central pedicle to the areolar region. For this purpose, the following structures have been employed, which, once repositioned and together, will act as a support network: (1) anterior pectoral fascia, (2) Cooper's intramammary ligament, (3) periareolar dermal flap, employed as skin inner lining. (4) application of absorbable polyglactine 910 or mixed mesh (with polyester) as a sandwich between both layers of skin, and (5) external cutaneous lining that composes the assembly of double skin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8618999     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199604001-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  16 in total

1.  Mastopexy for breast ptosis: Utility outcomes of population preferences.

Authors:  Ahmed Ms Ibrahim; Hani H Sinno; Ali Izadpanah; Joshua Vorstenbosch; Tassos Dionisopoulos; Mark K Markarian; Bernard T Lee; Samuel J Lin
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 0.947

2.  The evolution of breast reconstruction: a historical perspective.

Authors:  Manish C Champaneria; Wendy W Wong; Michael E Hill; Subhas C Gupta
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Reduction mammoplasty.

Authors:  Shrirang Purohit
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2008-10

Review 4.  Ptosis and Bottoming out Following Mastopexy and Reduction Mammoplasty. Is Synthetic Mesh Internal Breast Support the Solution? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Bishara Atiyeh; Fadi Ghieh; Fadel Chahine; Ahmad Oneisi
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 2.326

5.  Oncoplastic surgery in Japanese patients with breast cancer close to the areola: partial mastectomy using periareolar mammoplasty: a case report.

Authors:  Yuko Kijima; Heiji Yoshinaka; Munetsugu Hirata; Tadao Mizoguchi; Sumiya Ishigami; Akihiro Nakajo; Hideo Arima; Shinichi Ueno; Shoji Natsugoe
Journal:  Case Rep Surg       Date:  2011-09-11

6.  Results from over one year of follow-up for absorbable mesh insertion in partial mastectomy.

Authors:  Min Young Koo; Se Kyung Lee; Sung Mo Hur; Soo Youn Bae; Min-Young Choi; Dong Hui Cho; Sangmin Kim; Jun-Ho Choe; Jung-Han Kim; Jee Soo Kim; Jeong Eon Lee; Seok Jin Nam; Jung-Hyun Yang
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.759

7.  Improving the longevity and results of mastopexy and breast reduction procedures: reconstructing an internal breast support system with biocompatible mesh to replace the supporting function of the ligamentous suspension.

Authors:  Petrus V van Deventer; Frank R Graewe; Elisabeth Würinger
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 2.326

8.  Imaging findings of implanted absorbable mesh in patients with breast partial resection.

Authors:  Hyon Joo Kwag
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 2.759

9.  A versatile breast reduction technique: conical plicated central U shaped (COPCUs) mammaplasty.

Authors:  Eray Copcu
Journal:  Ann Surg Innov Res       Date:  2009-07-03

10.  The suitability of absorbable mesh insertion for oncoplastic breast surgery in patients with breast cancer scheduled to be irradiated.

Authors:  Taehyun Kim; Heunglae Cho
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2013-03-31       Impact factor: 3.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.