Literature DB >> 8618527

Development of the facial recess: implications for cochlear implantation.

T L Eby1.   

Abstract

More attention is being focused on the growth and development of the facial recess because of the use of cochlear implantation in children over 2 years of age and the prospect of using implants in even younger children. The facial recess and the extended facial recess were measured in 123 temporal bones from 73 individuals ranging in age from 8 weeks in utero to 7 years after birth. The goals were to trace the development of the facial recess and to determine whether this area continues to grow into childhood. The facial recess enlarges throughout fetal life with the development of the facial canal and the tympanic annulus. Reichert's cartilage, seen early in utero in the facial recess, gradually resorbs but may persist in the newborn. In full-term infants, the facial recess reaches 3.25 mm at the oval window and 2.62 mm at the round window. The extended facial recess reaches 3.79 mm at the oval window and 3.04 mm at the round window. No statistically significant growth of the facial recess after birth could be demonstrated in this study. The data suggest that the facial recess is probably adult sized at birth and should allow surgical access for cochlear implantation in very young children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8618527     DOI: 10.1097/00005537-199605001-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  7 in total

1.  Surgical and radiologic anatomy of a cochleostomy produced via posterior tympanotomy for cochlear implantation based on three-dimensional reconstructed temporal bone CT images.

Authors:  Eun-Ju Jeon; Beomcho Jun; Ji-Nam Song; Ju-Eun Kim; Dong Hee Lee; Ki-Hong Chang
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Comparison of cochlear implant relevant anatomy in children versus adults.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Fitsum A Reda; Alejandro Rivas; Jack H Noble; Mary S Dietrich; Benoit M Dawant; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Surgical anatomy of the chorda tympani: a micro-CT study.

Authors:  Lauren J McManus; Patrick J D Dawes; Mark D Stringer
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Role of HRCT and MRI of the Temporal Bone in Predicting and Grading the Degree of Difficulty of Cochlear Implant Surgery.

Authors:  Sanjay Vaid; Neelam Vaid; Manoj Manikoth; Amit Zope
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-05-05

5.  Posterior tympanotomy is a riskier procedure in chronic otitis media than in a normal mastoid: a high-resolution computed tomography study.

Authors:  Chang Woo Kim; Oh Joon Kwon; Jang Hee Park; Yeo Hoon Park
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  Cochlear Implantation in Infants: Why and How.

Authors:  Patricia L Purcell; Nicholas L Deep; Susan B Waltzman; J Thomas Roland; Sharon L Cushing; Blake C Papsin; Karen A Gordon
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  The Effect of Cochlear Implantation on the Improvement of the Auditory Performance in 2-7 Years old Children, Shiraz 2004-2008.

Authors:  Sayed Basir Hashemi; Abdolreza Rajaeefard; Hasan Norouzpour; Hamid Reza Tabatabaee; Leila Monshizadeh
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 0.611

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.